Why...dear god why do people rate crappy maps with a good rating? It's evo and fusion...I just do not understand why 6 second ninja cp's and random maps with no thought and so on get so many dl's and high ratings...why do people like crap? That isn't to say that some good maps don't do well but it makes you not want to create when you know you have made a good map...better than half the mess on TC and it gets...nothing. Yep, I am losing my mind.
It is a good question, i'll watch some PS4 streams and ask why they do thatOriginally Posted by stinky_the_goob Go to original post![]()
Redlynx clearly need to improve the rating system.
In all honesty I don't think its even the quality of the rating system, its the quality of the people rating them. Lots of new people who don't understand or appreciate what goes into a great track vs a quickie. A bit of education via the social media channels could help a little with this to fast-track the learning curve of the new audience, but even then there'll always be fools who downrate/uprate for silly reasons.Originally Posted by Jeruhnq Go to original post
The quality of the rating system is not the only reason of course but if the rating system change it could help!
If we were able to put 0 to 5* as Trials Evo. (or 0 to 10* why not), i think it could be always better than just 0* or 5* (/like - don't like).
They could also add a rating system like that :
0* to 10* for the driving line
0* to 10* for the decoration
etc...
With the main * at 5*.
But maybe the (new) players will take this as too complex or too serious for this type of game, who know ...