50 % more power on ps4 . er nope . | Forums

[TeriXeri]

I highly doubt any high tech new game would run good at 4k on good looking settings, it'd have to cost like $1000 hardware wise or cut down hard on graphics like anti alias/filtering/texture resolutions etc.

I don't see 4k be used even in PC gaming standards until at least like 2020, and even then I think a lot of devices will still run 720/1080 etc.

Game demos at E3 might have used 4k this year but those had like minimal of like a $4000 system to back it up with quad SLI/crossfire etc etc.

For next-gen blu rays and bigscreen TV's I can see it happen sooner (maybe some revised versions of the xbox/PS4 after a year or 2), but not for actual 3d high-end graphics just yet.

[RetiredRonin]

You can get alright 4K TVs for not a whole lot of change right now.

http://www.amazon.com/Seiki-Digital-.../dp/B00BXF7I9M

[rlmergeuser]

supports 3D and 4k which is nearly 4 times the resolution of 1080p.
Does anyone really think Microsoft would be so short sighted as to think 720p is the future? Please.
If certain games come out at 1080 for ps4 and 720 for xbox one it's more than likely due to The established developer of the franchise demanding crazy amounts of money to appear better on that platform.
...
Also, Xbox one games will support both native 4k resolution and upscaling to 4k.
Sony have said their console would support 4k output but not for playing games.
It's all irrelevant as we don't have the T.V's to handle that resolution yet.

Strongly disagree. Supporting certain output resolutions and having hardware powerful enough to render the latest games at those resolutions are two separate things. I assure you there will be no true 4k game on xbox one (pong perhaps?) and obviously not on ps4 either. If we get 1080p @30/60 we'll be lucky.

Maybe it won't happen and if it does it won't be untill later on in the consoles life I would imagine.
The point I was making is that some where saying the xbox one was finding it difficult to throw out 1080p resolution so I pointed out that it was ready and capable of producing 4k should developers wish to utilise that feature. I don't think 1080 will be an issue as Microsoft would not be that short sighted. It's what the developers can do with the hardware that matters.

[empecee]

http://news.xbox.com/2013/11/xbox-on...-entertainment SHOWS KINECT

[TheBlazeJp]

Not sure how to feel reading all of this. I've graduated to the snobby PC elitist and haven't looked back.

No longer is my gaming confined to the limits of a pre-manufactured system.

Just remember:

There is no reality, only perception.

+1

[jook13]

You can get alright 4K TVs for not a whole lot of change right now.

http://www.amazon.com/Seiki-Digital-.../dp/B00BXF7I9M

More reason to believe that this "next generation" is going to be dated and replaced so quickly. Those 4K TV's will be everywhere within a few years. We are going to be stuck with game consoles that simply do not have the power to take advantage of them. I dont see them lasting nearly as long as the 360 and PS3 did.... Imagine if the 360 and ps3 released with the ability to only play 480p. That is what this next generation feels like to me...

[BlueBadger400]

I meant the gfx, you can clearly see the difference in x1 and ps4.

Funny you should mention that, because I've read over 4 different reviews that say the opposite is true, and that there is no discernible difference.

Except for the fact that in the video above you can easily see the difference. The lightning in the games, everything. The graphics on ps4 suck and they always have.

Everyone thought blu-ray was amazing on Ps4 little did they know the human eye can only see 1080p. Which is the same as the 360s.

So literally there isn't any difference other then the title Blu-ray.

Regardless, xbox is better.

I don't even understand are we talking about the difference between xbone and ps4 or xbox360 and Ps4.

All I know at this point there isn't an option that's best for everybody. There are different platforms for people to choose and as long as they buy the product because it has features that they know they'll enjoy I really dont think you can go wrong.

[Blastergamer]

You can get alright 4K TVs for not a whole lot of change right now.

http://www.amazon.com/Seiki-Digital-.../dp/B00BXF7I9M

More reason to believe that this "next generation" is going to be dated and replaced so quickly. Those 4K TV's will be everywhere within a few years. We are going to be stuck with game consoles that simply do not have the power to take advantage of them. I dont see them lasting nearly as long as the 360 and PS3 did.... Imagine if the 360 and ps3 released with the ability to only play 480p. That is what this next generation feels like to me...

I don't see 4K TV going to most households like flat screens. It really makes no difference to your eye except a big screen, and you shouldn't sit too near big screens or your eyes get sore, and that means these screens won't be in small rooms and people wouldn't sit too near in a big room so with the distance & TV size, you would see human-eye 720p-1080p again. All what 4K new is, is nothing more a bigger screen with equaled resolution of the standard TVs.

Another word to this thread: Why care about graphics? Is the gaming environment changing more and more to a show with less and less button presses and open world (like RYSE)? Did people moan about Minecraft graphics? (Almost) everyone loved it. Did Microsoft told anything that "Next Generation" is "Next Gen Power"? Aren't they focusing on "Entertainment" and "Innovative" instead? Was Nintendo focusing on "Power" too? Nope, they were focusing on kids, creativity and fun. The only big console manufacturer is $ony which improvement focus is "Power".
Really guys, games (especially in the 80's) were here for entertaining and to gain new interest & fun. Nowdays, people bash about 3D games that the graphics suck even it is 100 times better than the first pac-man. I would like to hear from people, which they want more in a game: More content & scenery, or better graphics.

[rlmergeuser]

Another word to this thread: Why care about graphics? Is the gaming environment changing more and more to a show with less and less button presses and open world (like RYSE)? Did people moan about Minecraft graphics? (Almost) everyone loved it. Did Microsoft told anything that "Next Generation" is "Next Gen Power"? Aren't they focusing on "Entertainment" and "Innovative" instead? Was Nintendo focusing on "Power" too? Nope, they were focusing on kids, creativity and fun. The only big console manufacturer is $ony which improvement focus is "Power".
Really guys, games (especially in the 80's) were here for entertaining and to gain new interest & fun. Nowdays, people bash about 3D games that the graphics suck even it is 100 times better than the first pac-man. I would like to hear from people, which they want more in a game: More content & scenery, or better graphics.

Well said. A gamer who prioritizes graphics is a gamer who I pay no mind to.
"Especially in the 80's" though? The 90's & early 00's was the golden age for gaming man!

Is the gaming environment changing more and more to a show with less and less button presses

Mainstream "AAA" games, yes, unfortunately

[empecee]

the plot thickens ...............http://www.neowin.net/news/sony-to-d...-supporting-it