It is not what YOU do, but Supercross belongs to Trials Evolution too, and it doesn't mean the top players should disobey it.Originally Posted by ChicagoAJ
Don't forget it has a SX leaderboard too!![]()
To be a trials world champion you have to be good at all aspects no matter what. No excuses of camera angles and stuff, it's going to be the same **** for everyone... oh and just noticed NSPVenoms is top 5 in DLC and global and only played 19days! Top player in the world for me. Not about all this 50days gameplay and stuff!
Supercross is far to random to use in a tournament with such high rewards, the first lane has such a major advantage, the other three lanes can not see where the bike is going to land properly, they can't see their wheels at the start because of the camera, with the quality of players, whoever gets the first lane will win easily, 4th lane might aswell not bother playing
to be fair, days played isnt all that reliable - just think how many hundreds of hours xzample has put into track central compared to other top riders.Originally Posted by CCFCSNIPER
and im gonna agree with the others against supercross.
the core trials game mode is the one that counts toward global rank - its the one that people primarily care about grinding for points, rank, world records etc.
supercross is a secondary mode and is obviously much, much, much less competitive - yet it has been inserted into the biggest trials related competition ever.
the camera angle is awkward, theres no doubt about it - and though everyone has to play the same events, in my opinion a competition is more worthwhile when everyone is at their best, not handicapped by a sub-par game mode that is just not as well suited to high-level competition.
we all know what supercross is by now - theres no need to advertise/showcase it, the events should be chosen to benefit the competition and sx is a bad choice imo.
Maybe you are not aware of this yet, but the playtime on the leaderboard is far from accurate.Originally Posted by CCFCSNIPER
It counts both single player play time as well as Track Central playtime.
People with lots of playtime have devoted most of that time to Track Central, not to single player.
There is absolutely no way to tell how much a player has played single player.
ANY playtime arguments about who is the best or better player in Trials Evo are therefore completely useless.
Im sure most people will agree with this.
Maybe a good idea for Trials Fusion to track playtime for single player seperately from TC playtime.
Thanks man, just trying to repay you for all the laughs you gave me reading your comments in the World Record thread!Originally Posted by xzamplez![]()
Sounds like a good idea to me!Originally Posted by BigSh0tRob
Actually Connz and High deff don't play a lot of track central but they both played Trials HD A lot. Deff more so then Connz.
So realistically Naked is the best. Because of the fact that 80% of his playtime is in track central and 20% is in SP and he was only a top 200 rider on HD.
80% of his time spent in TC? I can guarantee without a doubt he has over 11 days played in SP.
It was obviously an exagerration. It`s probably closer to 60%.Originally Posted by ChicagoAJ
I would like to know who`s all qualifying, because I have no idea who from TWC 2 is of age. Would be crazy to see TBN Soty in the semis. Pretty versatile guy.