i feel the hardest should come last. maybe.
I call late timesavers "track breakers". The timesaver at the end of Colloseum is a perfect example.
I feel like hardest should be first and easier should be later. In general. Obviously exceptions must be made everywhere when designing a track with some flow.
+1Originally Posted by xzamplez
And Ridge Tracer
And Falling Down
I feel almost exactly the opposite, even if i really dislike the ending on that track too. Having to hit B 514362727 times before i can have a chance to improve my time can get on my nerves pretty easily.Originally Posted by xzamplez
i thk i hate the setup im currently playing lol, if the shortcut comes right away ill hate to restart over and over and if its by the end ill hate the track for wasting my time before faoulting
im never happy![]()
I don't understand this. If the timesaver is of equal difficulty, then it will take the same amount of tries. The only difference is that you have to go through the entire track before hitting the difficult timesaver.Originally Posted by stiggyhead
I put easy ones in everywhere....I find this doesnt become frustrating and it rewards the better riders who can hit them all.
What about a timesaver in the middle of the track?Originally Posted by eflixxx![]()