There would still be ninja's. They'd just not be labeled right (not like they all are anyway)
See the highest rated in trials section and you know what I mean.
Well if you can't beat them, or if you pick the bad ones. Then that's your fault...
If you wanted ninjas gone, you'd have to kill every ninja track maker and supporter in the world, even then ninja tracks will still prevail; consider other people opinions before you type these worthless threads please.![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't like it because I rarely see Easy-Hard tracks in the feed and these will mostly be rated as 5*.Originally Posted by cristan10
@Cluch: You should know that I really don't like these. I'm not swearing, I just don't like them because of that is posted above this column.
Well then go to search. then to easy, med. or hard difficulty- then released today. Problem solved.Originally Posted by Blastergamer
i think his point is the influx of crappy 10 minuet built so called ninja tracks called " bet you can do it " or some crap like that with a few stupidly placed obstacles..these tracks keep the good stuff out and work on your inner competitive self to beat it .some of them are just as bad as dont move tracks . i think thats what hes getting at .i cant do ninjas but i dont hate em. but i do hate tc ram packed with kiddie built crap .. hes got a point![]()
not true, theyre top of track central because the casual players who want gimmicks cant finish them to rate them down like they can with regular tracks.Originally Posted by ClutchMystaFlex
the problem is with the people playing ninja tracks and just insta-5*ing every one of them, even if they are of poor standard, just because they finished it.
its a silly argument from blastergamer but the ignorant overrating of ninja tracks is damaging and gives a deceptive view of which are the quality tracks in the feed.
its not fair on people who build very high quality easys/mediums/hards, knowing some half-baked ninja track is gonna get a better rating, just because of the few people who finish those tracks not using the 3* or 4* option when they should.
Exactly what he said!Originally Posted by WILLYUMZ
I know it's a silly thread but it just hurts me seeing those moderate theme ninja tracks rated top high and those people who took more time for Medium-Hard track get a lower rating that those average time created ninjas.
So, I say, RedLynx should give a ninja difficulty, not tag and every ninja will be on separate section, and if one track is chosen beginner-Hard but it's actually ninja, then we can report it as a ninja track and RedLynx put them in the ninja section, then everyone would be happy that the ninja wouln't be bothered in the feed.
Then the ninja track creators would then get their pitch forks out for any problems they have, as i said consider everyones thoughts.