Originally Posted by Barrybarfly
Its a cas eof ride it once and enjoy the atmosphere then delete it. There's no replay value because the actual track isnt very good. So it doesnt deserve to be a redlynx pick imo.
And what's wrong with that? Has anybody from redlynx ever stated that they pick tracks based on replayability? No.
First of, it's Redlynx picks. It's not "Tracks the community suggested redlynx should promote".
Redlynx picks the track that They enjoy. Be that a cinematic one time cool atmospheric track like Terminator 2 with No replayability or a rather boring looking extreme track with a great driving line and a great replayability, it's ultimately their choice, and whatever type of track they choose isn't really something the community should complain about.
Plus, i'm sure the majority of the community that bought the game is pretty bad at the game, and just play it for the fun each track is, and don't even think about replaying a track to get a better time. Those people problably don't care about a tracks replayability at all.
This is obviously nothing personal against you. I just think it's stupid that people complain over redlynx picks.
Like i said, it's called "Redlynx Picks" for a reason. They choose whatever tracks they like, be it an extreme track, a cinematic track, a cool skill game, or even just a new interesting mechanic or something like the airplane "Reel" that was featured a couple of weeks ago.