I just can't imagine this. Make the lady tall and her head will hit objects the same way. Keep the programming the same; even if the curves are more wholesome on a lady, you don't need to program for those RL
PS. I'm not Starfire999. I've seen him on this forum but i am NOT him.
If you'd have read this thread then you would have noticed that Starfire999 is a HER not a HIM, how disrespectful of you.Originally Posted by EonialXXXStarfire![]()
The Great Starfire has transcended beyond such plebeian frivolities as gender, ethnicity, and single forum accounts.
In fact, if The Great Starfire were to sign in with all of its accounts simultaneously, the result would be equivalent to a DDoS attack on Redlynx's servers.![]()
Originally Posted by nannerdw![]()
Not another one of these threads![]()
Surely these things are insignificant, its not a real person on the bike, its just a collection of weightless polygons. It would be just like making the rider invisible and building a new rider with a basketball head (which is currently possible).Originally Posted by bobozilla
My point being that as long as the rider skeleton model remains set the same, theoretically you could put a polar bear on the bike without any problems.
Males are top-heavy, females are bottom-heavy
weve seen wings and helmets.. surely some huge tits would be easy to add lol
They probably didnt think it was worth the extra work involved. They weighed the pros and cons. Extra time took vs. how many people would really appreciate it. There is a lot more work involved than you may think. Extra female styled gear, hair physics (if she tucks it in her helmet, whats the point?). Just my guess at least.
Somebody should just add 2 bouncing basketball boobs to the rider, problem solved.