Originally Posted by KyoshiYozima
Isn't that one of those DLC skill games?
But anyway, i timed out on inferno II like 3 times and the 1st time i beat it i had over 400 faults and like 29 mins. When i first beat diabolic i had maybe 100 faults and 13 mins or so. I got both the regular game and the 1st DLC at the same time, since when i entered trials the 1st DLC was already out.
Diabolic may be longer, so it has more obstacles and more chances to fault, but the obstacles on Inferno are harder obstacles, and for me took more faults resulting in more time.
And when i finally got good at trials i got a 0 fault run on Diabolic way before i got one on Inferno. Inferno was actually my last in game track to platinum and get 0 faults on.
Inferno 2 maybe just because i was far better rider when i started playing diabolic.
PS. developers forgetting how to play trials=?Originally Posted by sebbbi
I guess that this finally sattles it. We need a new trials game asp.
i zero'd diabolic quite quickly but i just cant do inferno2 without coming off once on the steel girder gap at the end. GGRRRAAAGGH!! its not even that tough of an obstacle
I think those game are both hard but i really find Inferno II harder that Diabolic! Maybe i just need to do some research about that game!
Well after almost a year of voting and discussion, Inferno appears to be the harder track.
Inferno II for sure, im sure i spent plenty of hours before i beat it
for the longest time i could get past the second obsticle
then it was the 5th
then it was the pipes near the end
then it was the jump to get to the hammers
but with with diabolic i just cracked down on it and beat it eventually
but then again, i was much better by the time diabolic came out compared to when i first beat inferno