1. #1

    Inferno II or Diabolic??

    Some think inferno is harder, some think diabolic is harder.
    Lets settle the dispute.

    Basic Bumps is just a joke btw.
    Share this post

  2. #2

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    Originally Posted by maliciousmike24
    Some think inferno is harder, some think diabolic is harder.
    Lets settle the dispute.
    Inferno II no question, it took me a couple tries to finally beat diabolic, even with a lot of faults, but it took me 7 hours to beat inferno II
    Share this post

  3. #3

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    I say Diabolic because there are a lot more places to fail on. Maybe I just need to practice ways to save myself on D. I can do most of Inferno II consistantly (apart from those killer tyres! ) and even if I hit an obstacly sloppy, there's almost always a way to save it.

    Altho Basic bumps is a lot harder to get high on the leaderboards than either of the Extreme ones mainly cos its so short and you have to ride flat out to get platinum.
    In the extreme tracks, you can get platinum even with a headstand or two!!!
    Share this post

  4. #4

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    I imagine if i tried diabolic with the skills i had when i first tried Inferno II i would have found diabolic harder.

    That said with my current set of skills i think inferno is harder to get a top time on.
    Share this post

  5. #5

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    beat all extreme in 1 go.... the first one in 2 mins, except inferno II which took 3, i was at the last bit twice aswell
    Share this post

  6. #6
    sebastianaalton's Avatar Trials Developer
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    2,455

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    Of course Diabolic felt easier on the first try, as I had already zero faulted all the other extreme tracks and had much more practice on the game.

    However if I currently try to get a zero fault run on both tracks, it takes me less tries to do that on Inferno II. Diabolic is just so much longer and has more places to fault. So I voted for Diabolic.

    UPDATE: Actually it seems I even haven't got a zero fault Diabolic run on public Xbox live yet . I have done that couple of times on development network... Have to do that on public Xbox Live as well before I forget how to play HD!
    Share this post

  7. #7

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    Originally Posted by sebbbi
    before I forget how to play HD!
    Is that cause your now to used to playing the next trials game?
    Share this post

  8. #8

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    Originally Posted by Lifeonaboard
    Originally Posted by sebbbi
    before I forget how to play HD!
    Is that cause your now to used to playing the next trials game?
    That's exactly what I was hoping/thinking.
    Share this post

  9. #9

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    Originally Posted by Jonofthejungle
    I say Diabolic because there are a lot more places to fail on. Maybe I just need to practice ways to save myself on D. I can do most of Inferno II consistantly (apart from those killer tyres! ) and even if I hit an obstacly sloppy, there's almost always a way to save it.

    Altho Basic bumps is a lot harder to get high on the leaderboards than either of the Extreme ones mainly cos its so short and you have to ride flat out to get platinum.
    In the extreme tracks, you can get platinum even with a headstand or two!!!
    Completely agree, inferno II isn't as technical i found...
    Share this post

  10. #10

    Re: Inferno II or Diabolic??

    i would say inferno 2 because i find it easier to 0 fault diabolic then i do to 0 fault inferno 2
    Share this post