Ok I'm getting a couple of disgruntled messages about the proof aspect of challenge 2 track.
Since this is a community tournament I'm going to leave it up to you guys and lets see what happens.
There are people complaining of broken replays and that they can't get a proof pic of their run and then there are those that are getting the replays to work and think that it could increase cheating if another method of proof is in place.
Now I will leave this up to you guys because frankly I trust you, whether there is proof or not. So this is for your benefit. I will let yo decide the outcome.
1. You are ok with people submitting proof of the screen after the track. It just shows the medal and time not track name or anything. This will help the people that have messed up replays but in reality it's not real proof since I can't verify other than you got that time. Easy to cheat
2. I only accept proof that has the rider on the finish line either after you raced the track or on replay. This decreases the likely hood of cheating but the people that got really good times are dead in the water and have to replay it to get proper proof.
Please understand that this can happen on any track so whatever you guys pick might have to be accepted for the rest of the tournament.
You guys choose!
If there are more options please let me know and I can add it to the poll.
-----------------------------
UPDATE - Added Murdoc's idea to the poll. I see what he means and I can easily accept that for the broken replays but people have to work with image manipulation which might be a problem for some. So if your replay is broken and you can do Murdoc's idea then go for it.
Scrub - what about my suggestion of using two pictures? one of a working replays finish time and one of the following screen showing the same finnish time and best time
Personally, I am a fan of this, but requiring more proof will likely see more gripes from the community.Originally Posted by MurdocLoch
I vote no proof while in the hospital. Otherwise, I'll have to get my brother who has never played trials before to run through the tracks and post a crappy time.![]()
how would this work if your replay is shot then you would do a crappy run then take a pic of that and then go to another track and take a pic of the final screen and you would have to merge the images together since my site doesn't support multiple pictures and upload.Originally Posted by MurdocLoch
If you could show me how it could work with an example that wold be great I can add it to the poll
I guess I'm a bit confuzzled![]()
this would definitly work. i'll try and explain it from memory.Originally Posted by GameScrub
first, you get any old run, and take a photo of it. obviously this photo will include the time you got (lets say, 0:12.345) and will prove what track its on.
next, take a photo of the screen at the end. this also has the time of your run you just did (0:12.345) but critically it shows your best time as well.
so this will show you that your best time was done on the track that you got 12.345 seconds on.
i hope this helps explain it
EXCELLENT WAY TO DO ITOriginally Posted by Reaper392
Reaper thats geniusOriginally Posted by Reaper392
Scrub, can you make it possible to add 2 proof pics to your site?
how mur shows it it good, but most people prob won't wanna take all that effort.
Originally Posted by Jarr3tt88![]()
I like this 2 picture system, but like it was said... thats a lot of work, unless u are able to post 2 prf pics