1. #31
    Originally Posted by Ubi-Mush Go to original post
    I will ask for an update with patch 2.0.
    Sorry if this sounds rude, I don't mean it to be I'm just getting a little fed up with this. Its been 3 days now, surely it doesn't take that long to get an update on how the new patch is coming along?
    Share this post

  2. #32
    I saw a more funny thing IN the trailer it still says "28 feb shadow" and on the page it says "avalible now" .. cant u remove this lies ??? its not avalible now!!
    and PLS set in a damn random generator these maps are way to easy ----.---- and some artifacts i dont even get REMAKE them cause the towns with artifacts have such advatange.. and eartch magics remake... they are so bad only reg are worth playing. so PLS i reallly hope for a real remake of artifact skills and stuff in the new exp. but this is just dreams i guess =(
    Share this post

  3. #33
    RobvD84's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    Posts
    570
    Not only that, but in my opinion the beginning of april is already over, and in a few days we are already in mid april (lets say that this is between 12 and 18 april). And next to that, the more i think about the stand alone expansion (the stand alone is in my opinion a slap in the face to those who bought the original game) and that Ubi is not going to patch the original game anymore, makes me sad and a bit angry. I mean if i look at other publishers or developers, there are a lot out there that keep continueing updating the games even the original games. Especially since not everyone can and will buy the expansion.
    I was thinking about buying the expansion, i am still deciding, but it makes it harder each day. Each passing day i come closer to the decision of not buying the expansion and all because of the patch. Because i just want a normal game that i can play. Not this, were i have to put so much effort into trying to get it to play.
    Share this post

  4. #34
    what happen to the patch??? delayed???
    Share this post

  5. #35
    Originally Posted by commanderzzz Go to original post
    what happen to the patch??? delayed???
    Who knows. The usual radio silence has been assumed yet again.
    Share this post

  6. #36
    Ubi-mush, it's been 8 days since you said you would inquire about the update, what's the news?
    Share this post

  7. #37
    znork's Avatar Forum mascot
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    6,336
    Well i have just been informed that the patch is not gona be called 2.0 but 2.1 and that its gona fix 200 ++++ bugs. ubi mush might get more true offical chanels. and that its gona be bgger then 1.8 gb . so its a big one!
    Share this post

  8. #38
    Originally Posted by znork Go to original post
    Well i have just been informed that the patch is not gona be called 2.0 but 2.1 and that its gona fix 200 ++++ bugs. ubi mush might get more true offical chanels. and that its gona be bgger then 1.8 gb . so its a big one!
    wow, where did u get that?
    can you post the source link here?
    Share this post

  9. #39
    ZergRusher's Avatar Duel of Champions Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,089
    Originally Posted by znork Go to original post
    Well i have just been informed that the patch is not gona be called 2.0 but 2.1 and that its gona fix 200 ++++ bugs. ubi mush might get more true offical chanels. and that its gona be bgger then 1.8 gb . so its a big one!
    If this is true then wow, wow, wow. Finally!! I hope they will fix almost everything i posted (sth like 50 bugs).

    If you just screwing with us then shame on you - it's not funny!!!
    Share this post

  10. #40
    Originally Posted by ZergRusher Go to original post
    If this is true then wow, wow, wow. Finally!! I hope they will fix almost everything i posted (sth like 50 bugs).

    If you just screwing with us then shame on you - it's not funny!!!
    From what I know of him, Znork tends to not mess around like that. *glare*

    All the same though, Znork, something like a source (or better yet, a fix-list) would be very much appreciated, if at all possible.
    Share this post