🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Far Cry forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #1
    pcconsolegamer's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The United States
    Posts
    21

    Re:hats off to ubisoft

    This game is good. No bugs(at least I haven't experienced any). Much better than Farcry 2.
    Share this post

  2. #2
    You obviously have never played decent pc fps games. Far cry 2 although not as good as the first one is a hundred times better then this rubbish. This is a console port aimed at kiddies otherwise why do you have to sit trough almost ten minutes of cut scenes. There is no need for it. I am so disgusted by this rubbish, if this is what pc games have come down to then the demise of pc gaming is not far away.
    Share this post

  3. #3
    mrtmrc's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    milano
    Posts
    559
    Originally Posted by FPSForever Go to original post
    This game is good. No bugs(at least I haven't experienced any). Much better than Farcry 2.
    ihihihhiih no bug??
    ok maybe gameplay is good FC2 vs FC3 1-3
    but multiplayer is shameful FC2 vs FC3 5-0
    Share this post

  4. #4
    pcconsolegamer's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The United States
    Posts
    21
    Well, I like this game. If you want to sit through 10min of cutscenes, play Max Payne 3.
    Share this post

  5. #5
    pcconsolegamer's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The United States
    Posts
    21
    Nope no bugs.
    Share this post

  6. #6
    rcole_sooner's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Norman, OK
    Posts
    13,889
    Well it has some RPG aspects to it besides being an FPS game. I like that. I liked Fallout 3, not NV so much, kinda got old.

    I liked the single player campaign.

    I wish there was more.

    I wish there was higher textures.

    But I did like what I got. Not bad for the $$ at all, IMO.
    Share this post

  7. #7
    Yes very little value in this game, the modders will make it what it should have been if allowed. Should have been a $20 title. I've seen better games with more content from indie devs with only 2 guys. I still give it a shot for the open world part, but keep running into funny stuff. Stuff that shouldn't be in this type of game. Stuff that makes no sense, illogical, and completely unthoughtful, like the loot system, inventory system, menu system and so on, very consolish, and in dire need of an overhaul. Weapons are comical. Can shot an arrow precisely over 200M while aiming less than the 50M mark on the bow, and can't shoot the same target with an assault rifle... funny stuff. But the additional stuff like wildlife was nice. Always found the insects annoying because of how they were implemented, they did a poor job on that. Not to mention the other poor sections of the game. The game should have been a movie. The actor who did Vlaas wasted his talent on this game. His job as the villian deserved a movie script not a scripted forced button mashing console port game. Even the editor is still a joke, and worse to boot than FC2. IMO Just Cause 2, eventhough 3rd person only beats this game hands down for value, and fun.
    Share this post

  8. #8
    pcconsolegamer's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The United States
    Posts
    21
    Well, uplaysucks899, I still like it, it's One of the better games I've played, in quite a while. Sure, it may be a console port, but what do you want, perfect? NO Game is going to be 100 Percent once it is released to the public wether or not it is Just cause etc, that is why Developers release patches to fix what they missed.
    Share this post

  9. #9
    I had no technical issues with the game. I finally finshed the game. I worked through all of the side quests, all of the extra kills, and quest of the hunter, collected all relics, lost letters the extra content on one play through.

    I delayed killing Vaas and Hoyt in order to complete all of the extra stuff.

    Far Cry 3 is too easy. It alsp lacks something. Skyrim is vast and the game never ends ( I have close to 600 hrs. on Skyrim ). The Mass Effect series had a rpg element with love interest.

    I'll take Deus Ex Human Revolution.

    I plan to go back and give FC2 another try just to see if I can develop a liking for it.

    Far Cry 3 is hollow.
    Share this post

  10. #10
    pcconsolegamer's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The United States
    Posts
    21
    PBNA-Stringdude;first, thanks for the reply. I wouldn't say farcry 3 is hollow, just something different the developers wanted to try. I've only had the game a few days, and not done with it yet, Farcry 2? well the developers tried, but missed the mark. Not saying it wasn't a good game, it just wasn't as open world as like it was suppose to be. If you'd go off the beaten path in 2, you'd pass out;that gol annoying. Also, having Malaria in 2 was also frustrating. You'd be in the middle of a gun battle, then have to deal with you're malaria before you could continue;Also, respawning guard posts, etc. That got tiresome/old. I've never played Deus Ex Human Revolution. Thanks again.
    Share this post