All these clips came from just one match and every single match I've played has been like this. This has got to be the worst online experience I've ever had in my life. Whoever was responsible for this god awful p2p system needs to be fired or something.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDdV_WHntyk
Yeah, that has happened to me at least a dozen times now. It's quite frustrating to play this game. Also, the HUD is worse than MOHW. You have sh*t popping up in the middle of the scree every **** second and you can't even see what's going on. FC2 was just brilliant in that sense. It had minimum hud, no mini map, no OP kill streak and most of all it had dedicated servers. FC2 MP tanked cos of ubi server crashes and not being able to join a match in progress. I was hoping it'd add those features that was missing in FC2 and make FC3 mp experience even better. But, boy was I wrong ? It seems like they took the worst features from COD and tried to implement those to FC3 mp.Originally Posted by ShadyMotley Go to original post![]()
**** me game is new expect server issues. Just like every new game COD/BF3 all have server issues on release.
Dont be making Videos about **** just to get the views
Sad person!
Originally Posted by earth0007 Go to original post
P2P is rubbish no matter how pretty you dress it up. Time will not fix that.Originally Posted by shankly1985 Go to original post
Yes I agree P2P sucks but COD gets by fine with it. Yes the HOST leaving crap is super horrible, but what we getting now is same what happens with every new COD game. Give it week and a patch later to address the demand on the servers and things will perform better.
Originally Posted by ShadyMotley Go to original post
Using COD as the benchmark for FPS's these days is not a good thing. By no means am I trying to be rude, but COD is everything that is wrong with the industry, to me it was great a few iterations ago but it is now stale to me and I have moved on, but the industry hasn't and tries to emulate it in nearly everyway.Originally Posted by shankly1985 Go to original post
http://au.ign.com/articles/2012/03/2...ds-more-action
^^That article says it all, the RE6 creators said they need to make RE more like COD to move units, and the metacritic reviews say it all (the industry listens to metacritic feedback). It got 67/100 average reviewer score and a 3.7/10 for user score. The proof is in the pudding, just because COD does it doesn't mean others should follow suit.
For transparency sake I should also mention that RE5 (which was the beginning of the slippery slope of decline for the series) got an average review score of 83/100 and a user score of 7.5, and by no means was the game perfect but it still held on (barely) to its RE roots.
How f*cking clueless are you ? It works for COD because it has a huge player base. Right now, about 50k people are playing BLOPS2 at the same time. Also, BLOPS 2 doesn't have a p2p system, they have lobbies that run on treyarc dedicated servers. Even MW3 had unranked dedicated servers. With 600 people online at a time, a p2p system would never work for fc3. It'll only get wose when the current players quit the game one by one.Originally Posted by shankly1985 Go to original post