Wonder if a country actually got this technology? | Forums

[Icecy67]

Can you imagine the horror and damage that can be dealt if a country got this type of technology for real(any country)especially iran,saudia arabia,pakistan,

[IV-70]

First, interesting to see saudi arabia on your list.

I'm more concerned about iran getting nukes and israel thinking its needed to deny them this, something they already have themself, than a few 3rd world countries having camo and sensors 'nades.

I'm sure all those gadgets wil not stand a chance against an airstrikes. Infantry is not what future wars will be about.

[Icecy67]

First, interesting to see saudi arabia on your list.

I'm more concerned about iran getting nukes and israel thinking its needed to deny them this, something they already have themself, than a few 3rd world countries having camo and sensors 'nades.

I'm sure all those gadgets wil not stand a chance against an airstrikes. Infantry is not what future wars will be about.

for saudi arabia i only added that becaue if i racall osama bin laden was from there or was he hideing there can't remember and as for the future war not needing infantry think about it the scouts camo they can sneek in n get intel or kill entire enemy camps or the senor grenades can be used to scope out a enemy camp makeing everyone there defensles also if the otr was real theres no hideing the psycological warfare is even more important than the one with guns thats how america beat japan or was it germany

[shobhit7777777]

@OP

Are you from the US?

[Icecy67]

@OP

Are you from the US?

yes n b4 anyone get into this countryvscountry crap understnd i said ANY COUNTRY!!!!! includeing the us it would b bad for any country to get this tech b4 anyone else caue then they can basically destroy every outher country

[IV-70]

yes n b4 anyone get into this countryvscountry crap understnd i said ANY COUNTRY!!!!! includeing the us it would b bad for any country to get this tech b4 anyone else caue then they can basically destroy every outher country

My point is that those little gadgets won't 'destroy' other countries, B-2's bomb countries back into the stoneage. Infantry is not the future.
But yes, for infantry this can be devasting, just this wont decide the war, nothing i would consider a real threat, just a PIA.

ps hitler was from austria, still we had to deal with 'his' germany.

[Icecy67]

My point is that those little gadgets won't 'destroy' other countries, B-2's bomb countries back into the stoneage. Infantry is not the future.
But yes, for infantry this can be devasting, just this wont decide the war, nothing i would consider a real threat, just a PIA.

ps hitler was from austria, still we had to deal with 'his' germany.

Think about it this way the us is detroying a entire country with our great military and battel tactics our weaponrie is better (not true or mabey it is i don't know)and we all but took out everything n we got the outher country backed up to the point that only one more battel will bring them to utter defeat.

But it just so happens that the scientist in that country were creating this technology and they decide to unleash it they send enemys into our camps slaughter our soldiers get our intel find our positions and stuff find out who our leaders are etc etc all without raising a single alarm my point is information is the mot dangerous weapon of all have you ever heard the verse (knowledge is power)well it is very much true a country of utter dominance can be brang down by one piece of info a entire war can change at the snap of a finger based off of intel.

Anyone can have the greatest weapon but there is alway a flaw to any weapon,battel tactic or anything else if you know the flaw so yeah weaponrie is the main thing in a war but would you rather have ppl running around jut shooting or would you rather they have a plan hell the us had less man and weaponrie then the british in the revolutionary war but we won our independece because we had knowledge of there movements/there flaws.

[shobhit7777777]

@Icey

while your concern for safety is understandable.....please understand that the game and the representation of the tech in it is a FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR cry from reality. The idea of a 4 men wearing inviso cloaks and chucking magic sight balls to slaughter entire platoons is a work of fiction.

[Compassghost]

http://www.star.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/proj...DIA/xv/oc.html

Seeing through walls already.

[Icecy67]

@Icey

while your concern for safety is understandable.....please understand that the game and the representation of the tech in it is a FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR cry from reality. The idea of a 4 men wearing inviso cloaks and chucking magic sight balls to slaughter entire platoons is a work of fiction.

yes i know that this type of technology is far out of our reach and not at all real im surprised you didn't understand that the question was metephorical