1. #1
    TIBUSH's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29
    I supose that Mr. Maddox and team are working on this.

    http://www.gdhardware.com/interviews/agiea/001.htm

    Can't imagine the improvement...
    Share this post

  2. #2
    TIBUSH's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29
    I supose that Mr. Maddox and team are working on this.

    http://www.gdhardware.com/interviews/agiea/001.htm

    Can't imagine the improvement...
    Share this post

  3. #3
    Taylortony's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    8,557
    Isnt it supposed to be faster??
    Share this post

  4. #4
    alert_1's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    715
    I afraid it's not usable for realistic flight sim - some time ago there was comprehensive thread about it.
    Share this post

  5. #5
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> This includes things such as Rigid Body Dynamics, Collision Detection, Fluid Simulation, Soft Bodies and Fracturing of objects </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And again it prooves this chip is aimed at the FPS-market, not for sims. Tests will show how much faster it is, reminding everybody, that all info from and to the PCI-Bus use CPU&RAM, too. Until these test are provided, I remain curious, openminded, but not too optimistic.

    Physics is not physics. Reading the article, you'll notice that it is aimed for particle systems 'n stuff. If at all this is hardware can help modelling damage effects, smoketrails, etc. but not flight modells.
    Share this post

  6. #6
    "Rigid Body Dynamics, Collision Detection, Fluid Simulation, Soft Bodies and Fracturing of objects"

    Those are all used in putting together a flight sim, I'm a bit confused as to why you don't think it will be useful. I can see uses in damaging modeling right now.
    Share this post

  7. #7
    RigidBodyDynamics = Weight and bouncing behaviour of objects.
    CollisionDetection = detection of collision between complex (e.g. curved) objects (like 3D-Objects in UT2003/4 "StaticMeshes")
    Fluid simulation = How a fluid flows and how it is deformated by objects.
    SoftBody = Deformation of objects like cloth and stuff
    Fracturing = Exploding of objects into objects or particles.
    Beyond that mainly support of particle rendering = Smoke and particle emitters renderation

    Nothing usefull for flight dynamics, airflow, complex physics or even trajectory. You can make it look nicer but that's about it.
    Share this post

  8. #8
    I still think there's a good chance it'll be implemented in BoB to help with the EXTREMELY performance heavy dynamic weather system.

    Fluid dynamics system will come quite handy in simulating a cloud front pouring in over the horizon, or wing trails and eddies created by your wings pushing through cloud. Not to mention a next-generation wave system - English Channel.

    Also StellarRat is right in saying it does have a real-time application for the Damage Modelling.

    But you're also right in saying that it's mainly a visual thing. Methinks that the Physics Chip driven weather will be similar to the water=3 of the current generation: those who can afford the top end systems with the right hardware will get an extra level of eyecandy over everyone else.

    Just as long as it doesn't give one set of hardware a gameplay advantage over another, I'll be happy

    ----
    Share this post

  9. #9
    Wouldn't fluid simulation be appliciable to modelling airflow over a surface? Like airflow over the wings of a plane? Or is that something different?
    Share this post

  10. #10
    lbhskier37's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,153
    fluid flow is very complex, and there are many different ways to model it. The assumptions someone would make in modeling fluid flow in a FPS would be very different from the assumptions one would make in a flight sim for the flight model. The fluid flow models would be very different in these cases. If this thing is mainly setup to do eyecandy type stuff, the chances of its fluid model being of any use in a flight sim are pretty slim.
    Share this post