1. #21
    stinkhammer6's Avatar Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    645
    Like I care about the history of a taco, taco bell rocks.
    Share this post

  2. #22
    No King was a ignarint son of a *****!!! It was Andrews who was working with limatid resources because King wanted all DD's ready for Japan or the German surface fleet.
    Share this post

  3. #23
    Yen Lo's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,645
    "ignarint" Is that the same thing as ignorant?
    Share this post

  4. #24
    Yen Lo's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,645
    Originally posted by Funkasoar:
    I'm just now reading a number of books which chart the war against the U-Boats and it described the entry of the US into the war as the U-Boat's second "happy time". Thing is that the petulant arrogant American Admirals refused to acknowledge the lessons learned from the British and went ahead and did everything the same way the Brits did in 39. It was only after the U-Boats were sinking 800 000+ tons a month that they decided to humble themselves.

    Only thing I can say: Americans

    They never change

    Thats like the Bitish and their war in the Falklands, in hindsight I bet the wish they would have had air supremency, man they were losin ships left and right. I remeber watchin that war on the news every night to see what ships got sunk everynight.
    Share this post

  5. #25
    stinkhammer6's Avatar Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    645
    Same thing when the brits came to america, they got a giant boot in their stern pipe and arrived back home and the boot was still lodged there.
    Share this post

  6. #26
    British ships sunk every night? That would be 30 or so ships. Guess the officials must have lied about the 6 or so that were actually sunk.
    I was in Argentina recently and did not meet one person that thought they had any right to invade the Falkland Islands. I met POWs of the Brits and they had nothing but high praise for their captures.
    Argentina has a decent air force and when you put ships in harm's way, harm can come to them. But your indication of mass slaughter is inaccurate.

    America was aware of what was coming to crush our enemies and could afford the losses. America made mistakes for sure, unlike Germany which made no such mistakes. Compare the overall blunders and the US looks pretty good. Our mistakes did not cost us the war. Germany's mistakes did. Talk about fuzzy math!!
    Wulfmann
    Share this post

  7. #27
    stinkhammer6's Avatar Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    645
    Its great when one country bashes another country without thinking of all the faults they have currently and had in the past.
    Share this post

  8. #28
    Kaleun1961's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,750
    To answer the question, the Americans didn't lose any troop ships. The U-boats enjoyed a brief second Happy Time in the Fall of '42 because so many escorts were held back for the Torch landings in North Africa. After those landings, the escorts returned to the Atlantic in time for the massacre of the U-boats in the Spring of '43.
    Share this post

  9. #29
    Originally posted by Yen Lo:


    Thats like the Bitish and their war in the Falklands, in hindsight I bet the wish they would have had air supremency, man they were losin ships left and right. I remeber watchin that war on the news every night to see what ships got sunk everynight.
    Maybe thats why the Argentine pilots called the Harriers "The Black Death".
    And as far as I can remember,I don't recollect any British aircraft being shot down.
    I say recollect because I was there.

    There goes the Air Supremacy theory out of the window.

    Someone may put me right,but I think only 5 maybe 6 ships were sunk,3 destroyers, a cargo and an LSL "Galahad".So you will agree,ships being sunk left and right,is just conjecture on your part.

    I'm not after a long winded debate/argument,I'm only trying to put the facts straight.No offence intended.
    Share this post

  10. #30
    Stink,

    What's your reason for hating the U.S. so much ? ....I mean, hating everything but the Taco's. Disgruntled military man maybe ?

    Ya, it's been "en vogue" to bash the U.S. ever since Viet Nam. Sometimes deservingly, sometimes not....I suppose. Americans seem like they are getting tired of it. It's not hard to get a rise out of 'em anyway. Sometimes it's fun, depending who you get on the line "hook and sinker". I don't blame some for being a little on the defensive side though. It's only human nature to be hated when you have everything (except good beer). I wouldn't take it too personally.

    What do I know though, I'm only a dope smoking, "lets all hug each other" Canadian....but I don't take it too personally...
    Share this post