1. #1
    rain89c's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    U.S.A
    Posts
    632
    AC1 had breathtaking graphics, especially when exposed to the sun, it felt amazingly realistic and real. The cities were outstanding and perfectly done.

    Now to AC2, the graphics looks downgraded and more cartoonish, the engine looks different than AC1.

    Now I look at AC:Brotherhood, and it looks even worst in certain buildings and landscapes,
    for example take a look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muHPjaUZ2PI

    look at 2:15-2:19, horrible models and textures on the structures!

    Why arent they using the AC1 engine?

    Red Dead redemption's graphics blows AC2+AC Brotherhood out of the water...
    Share this post

  2. #2
    Murcuseo's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,206
    That's your first close up view of those structures and it looks like post effects is on so I don't think it does it justice.

    I'll reserve judgement on the graphics until I play the game.
    Share this post

  3. #3
    brotherhood has had a very noticable graphical upgrade last I checked, and of course stuff might still look a bit rough in places, I remember that we had two screenshots of the same scene in AC2 and they had several graphical differences.

    and I think AC1 only looked better than AC2 in a few ways as well of the vise versa.
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Mr_Shade's Avatar Senior Community Manager
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    EMEA CRC
    Posts
    21,528
    Originally posted by rain89c:

    look at 2:15-2:19, horrible models and textures on the structures!

    Why arent they using the AC1 engine?

    Red Dead redemption's graphics blows AC2+AC Brotherhood out of the water...
    I personally would wait and see..

    Even at 720p Youtube does compress video quite a bit, so it can smooth out textures, plus as already posted, the effects such as bloom may also be playing a role in the textures looking smoother than normal...


    From the screenshots I have seen, scattered about these forums, it appears to be a very good looking game..
    Share this post

  5. #5
    paisepatruuna's Avatar Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    40
    In ac1 when you look far then graphics look better but in close but they are still great but ac2 has better
    Share this post

  6. #6
    I think it's just that since the city is going to be bigger this time around the less detailed buildings in the background are going to be more noticable. And since this is really going to be pushing the engine to it's limits there might be some less detailed textures and geometry than before. Overall it's looking much the same as AC2 from what I can tell. The only very noticable upgrade to the game is the much improved facial animations.
    Share this post

  7. #7
    I personally didnt notice much of a difference so im happy with the graphics for both AC1 and AC2 and even Brotherhood from what I have seen so far.
    Share this post

  8. #8
    Originally posted by paisepatruuna:
    In ac1 when you look far then graphics look better but in close but they are still great but ac2 has better
    Are you crazy? The AC2 graphics were much worse than the AC1 graphics. But fortunately there's been a slight improvement with ACB as far as I can tell.
    I do see what the OP means when we look at the dev diary. But, as has already been posted, this may be misleading. Wait until the game comes out, then feel free to rant
    Share this post

  9. #9
    I'd sooner trade a bigger, more diverse city for lower graphix quality anyway, frankly.
    Share this post

  10. #10
    Plus, you can see the movement graphics are a lot smoother. Look at the GC Demo when Ezio is climbing around the pillars. The way he grabs the pillar in the first jump looks Be-A-Utiful!
    Share this post