yes
no
dont know
plz raaaid stop it
the left cable is wrapped without depth while the right one with a lot of depth
then theres a ring weight not tight to the cable but that slides in it
basically the ring weight pulls the same on both cables but one has no multiplication while the other has a lot, and the caught is that it has multiplication without varying the radius
so i dont know how but gravity should take the weight down by creating a torque though theres no arm
TRANSLATION:Originally posted by raaaid:
according the physics i study for exams torque is always the vectorial product of arm and force
"According to real Physics I should study for exams, I, in a simplistic way, interpret that torque is always the vectorial product of an arm and a force."
TRANSLATION:but according the physics i study by myself here you have a torque with a force without an arm
![]()
"But according to Physics of my fancy and invention, which I take off my a$s on a daily basis, here you have a torque with a force without an arm."
(Here goes some indecipherable drawing that looks one of those things you do in ten seconds when you try to draw "advisable" in a Pictionary game.)
TRANSLATION:Originally posted by DuxCorvan:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by raaaid:
according the physics i study for exams torque is always the vectorial product of arm and force
"According to real Physics I should study for exams, I, in a simplistic way, interpret that torque is always the vectorial product of an arm and a force."
TRANSLATION:but according the physics i study by myself here you have a torque with a force without an arm
![]()
"But according to Physics of my fancy and invention, which I take off my a$s on a daily basis, here you have a torque with a force without an arm."
(Here goes some indecipherable drawing that looks one of those things you do in ten seconds when you try to draw "advisable" in a Pictionary game.) </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Incredible Dux, how did you learn to translate raaaid's posts?
well i did yesterday the experiment at 6 am and the answer is theres no torque
in fact is pretty stablished that torque equals arm and force, no way around this
so to build a box that holds on a corner an inverted pendulum i need to rewrite mechanics
well the wolrd is a dream after all i think i can do it
i think i just need to put rails to this pulley
i did the experiment with plastiline and pencils and with rails the multiplication of the pulley seems unlimited
though the more multiplication also implies a slight growth of the arm i hope not they are not in proportion
i think this last point is a matter of believing
as i believe god is not cruel so in my universe is not, i believe he allows multiplication of a pulley without having to grow the raidus proportianlly
TRANSLATION:Originally posted by raaaid:
well i did yesterday the experiment at 6 am and the answer is theres no torque
in fact is pretty stablished that torque equals arm and force, no way around this
so to build a box that holds on a corner an inverted pendulum i need to rewrite mechanics
well the wolrd is a dream after all i think i can do it
i think i just need to put rails to this pulley
i did the experiment with plastiline and pencils and with rails the multiplication of the pulley seems unlimited
though the more multiplication also implies a slight growth of the arm i hope not they are not in proportion
i think this last point is a matter of believing
as i believe god is not cruel so in my universe is not, i believe he allows multiplication of a pulley without having to grow the raidus proportianlly
"Well, yesterday, while I was half-asleep, I did the experiment, and, quite surprisingly, the answer is: aw, sh*t there's no torque.
In fact, I've always known and been said what would happen, but I ignored it, though I knew there was no way around.
So, to build a box that holds on a corner, this is, an inverted pendulum, I'd need to be a God or live in a fictional world, and rewrite Mechanics, but that won't discourage me.
Well, the world is a dream after all, so I stubbornly think that I can do it, even if never ever could do any other fictional absurd thing against the laws of nature that I've tried in my whole life.
I think I just need to put some mysterious things I call "rails" to this pulley, and it still won't do sh*t, but what the heck.
So I made a grotesque mess with plasticine and pencils and you-know-what, and now Frankenstein's monster lives, ¡he lives!
Though so much multiplication, implies also a small erection of the arm, and I hope the ***** is not out of proportion.
I think this last point is a matter of believing: if you believe elephants fly quite enough, then elephants fly.
Since I believe God is not cruel, and so, in my flying-elephant-universe he is not, I firmly believe he'll allow something so utterly unrelated to cruelty as pulleys multiplying themselves without having to grow their bellies gruesomely."