I grew up with Rayman 3, and I played Rayman one but never Rayman 2. I didn't even know Ly or Globox's kids before I went to a Rayman fanpage online...
Either way, though, if they did bring back Rayman, I'd like to see some continuity in the series for once. I mean, worlds vanish, Globox is suddenly single, no one else from the earlier games even shows up, and then Globox disappears when RRR comes around. The only hint that any other games even HAPPENED (aside from a view hidden sights, a la Razorbeard with his Robo-Pirates hidden in Rayman 3 and the Ly statue) is the Lums. At least, as far as I know.
Well it;s actually pretty sad that all of the fans (including me) are like: "Rabbids don't fit with rayman!". But actually they would have, if it was in an platformer game. I mean, Michel Ancel designed the rabbid himself. What I am saying is that if they made rayman (4) raving rabbids a platformer game, we wouldn't complain. Well maybe if it was a horrible game.Originally posted by spiraldoor:
They don't fit the style of the Rayman games at all. It would kill the series for me if they appeared in it proper.
Ummm...It just taked me one day to finish Rayman 3
And Rayman 2....About 4 days.
Rayman Raving Rabbids in 5 hours LOLOLOL
Also,you're saying that just to blame the rabbids,Rabbids games aren't bad!!!,the only thing that people hates it's that they replaced such a good game as Rayman 4 was going to be.
And i got some good hours of fun by playing RRR so i won't say that i hate it anymore,the only bad thing it's that it doesn't have storyline
i haven't posted in ages.
However, to contribute to the argument earlier that Raving Rabbids should die and don't fit into the rayman world, There was rabbits in Rayman 3. They threw rocks at you, and were probably the basis behind the rabids. I am not defending rabbids here, I don't like rabbids at all, but I am adding an argument which is related to this.