1. #1
    S !
    Which is the main difference between the X800 XT PE and the more recent X850 XT PE AGP port ? Thanks !
    Best,
    Share this post

  2. #2
    -HH-Quazi's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,927
    Got to www.ati.com and do a side by side product comparison. Seems clock speeds are a little faster and the X850XT PE reads Gpixels and Mtriangles a little faster. You can see for yourself at the link I posted here. Oh yea, and the factory heatsink that comes on the X850XT PE is akin to the ATI Silencer as it blows the hot air out the back of your computers case. Allot better system than the X800XT PE heatsinks for sure.
    Share this post

  3. #3
    Udidtoo's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,747
    800XT PE = 520 MHz core clock, 1120 memory clock

    850 XT PE = 540 Mhz core,1180 memory clock

    At 400 core clock 980 memory clock the 800 Xl is nothing to overlook when you consider that they go 200 to 300 dollers less.

    I could tell you some in game averages that I and another -HH- get with 6 to 8 live bodies and 20+ AI planes on our X800 XT PE's but we just get called fanboys by the Nvidia faithful or worse outright liars. Suffice it to say its very very purdy.
    Share this post

  4. #4
    FiReLiOn1800's Avatar Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    130
    my next card will be ATI i think...but i will say that my 6800 gt runs this game well...sorry to say but you ATI boys dont have our perfect water yet...unless the 850 supports SM3...and by the way spinter cell Chaos Theory looks outstanding in SM3
    Share this post

  5. #5
    PF_Coastie's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    3,721
    Originally posted by FiReLiOn1800:
    my next card will be ATI i think...but i will say that my 6800 gt runs this game well...sorry to say but you ATI boys dont have our perfect water yet...unless the 850 supports SM3...and by the way spinter cell Chaos Theory looks outstanding in SM3
    Well, it may be pretty for screenshots, but what good does it do if you can't get playable fps with it? No machine can currently run this game maxed out in all situations.
    Share this post

  6. #6
    To expand on what Coastie is saying here...

    1) Only a couple of games use pixel shader 3.0 and in both cases, the frame rates are unplayable. No major game that I know of except for BoB will use 3.0 and the pace of CPU performance increases has slowed to a relative crawl in the last two years and will stay that way until some major breakthrough in material sciences happens. In other words, each increase we get from now on will be both expensive and in smaller steps.

    2) As power hungry the 16 pixel pipeline ATI cards are, they are not nearly as bad as the newer nVidia cards that way.

    3) Reviews these days are being less than genuine when dealing with 16 pixel pipeline video cards. As you start dealing with 4X AA & AF and more, the ATI cards shine well past the nVidia cards which both take a bigger frame rate hit AND do not deliver the same increase in actual picture quality at the same time. Someone tried to tell me AA & AF are outdated because "everyone" will soon be using settings higher than 1600 X 1200 resolution... that Dude needs to see point #1.

    4) Even nVidia's version of SLI is very dated technology and ATI will come out shortly with a dual card system that is simple and requires no profiles or any other buggy, nonworkable deals like it. Instead of splitting the screen between the cards, the ATI syste, will simply have the lighter pixels on one card and the darker ones on the other. Going with nVidia's SLI now is like going to RDRAM... it is expensive and gains you little in real world performance regardless of the less than genuine reviews you may have seen... and unlike RDRAM, nVidia's SLI is buggy!
    Share this post

  7. #7
    even with a 6800GT or ultra you can play in 1600x1200 full AA etc on Perfect setting with playable FPS(i have an XFX ultra AGP version and i run even with around 32 airplanes, heavy flak from ships etc with a steady 40 fps(when there are explosion the game only goes towards 20 for a sec)
    Share this post

  8. #8
    FiReLiOn1800's Avatar Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    130
    Coastie chill out buddy...
    2800 barton @2.45
    1 gig corsair 3200 xms
    bfg 6800 gt oc
    runs all my single playre campains fine so far wit h 2QxAA and 4xAF
    perfect
    water=2
    forest=3
    effects=1
    1280x1024
    and i always stay above 30 fps...the only time it slows for me is if i make a kamakazi run and it may drop to 24 or 25 for a sec or 2 and it adds some drama if you ask me...ha...
    my point is my weak *** rig runs this game this well so dont player hate cause my toy is a little cooler than yours...like i said my next card will be ATI...but for now the GT is great and so is my perfect water...and dont talk about screen shots cause if i did crank my water to 3 it would make you cry...its so beautiful...and no graphics coruption for me...thanx ...
    and lucky boy i agree with some of your points but number 3 is well its ******ed...what reviews are you talking about man...thats something a vauge politicion would say....and point number one what framerates are unplayable...you did not here what i said so ill yell this time CHAOS THEORY ROCKS IN SM 3 AND SO DOES FB+AEP+PF...you can come over and see it anytime...
    Share this post

  9. #9
    FiReLiOn1800's Avatar Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    130
    CHANGE YOUR CLAN NAME TO PLAYER HATER NATION....
    Share this post

  10. #10
    madsarmy's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,361
    You are a
    Share this post