Unpopular idea but want you opinions please | Forums

[stdape]

Definetly not. Bad enough having Terminator!! Zombie Games are so many, it has got to be a drag.

[P4rk3R_817]

I guess victory is born of a thousand failures so I’ll chalk this question up as one of those lol.

Tungsten no from me.

[FcAc-No-Moe]

Zombies make an appearance on the next announcement. people scream louder and even more louder, fast forward a bit, all of you guys are playing it, loving it and praising the studio for a well done content... it never fails

[ApexMandalorian]

Zombies make an appearance on the next announcement. people scream louder and even more louder, fast forward a bit, all of you guys are playing it, loving it and praising the studio for a well done content... it never fails

Not all of us. They don't deserve praise for content like that. Just like I don't praise them for the stupid Rainbow Six, Splinter Cell, Predator, and Terminator crossovers. Things that are done well will be praised, but not bad content. It also doesn't mean we'll ignore the good parts and treat everything like it's bad. That'll just mean that the next game is bad in some areas. The best approach is to praise the things that are good, and criticize the things that are bad, so that hopefully, the next game keeps the good stuff and leaves out the bad.

Now, if you're so skeptical that you don't think there's even a small percentage chance that things will improve, why are you still here (generally speaking, btw)? And if you're trying to be so positive because you think they'll only listen if you praise them along with the criticism, then you're not being as honest as you should about what the problems are, meaning the next game will have the same problems. I don't think we should be rude in our feedback, but we certainly should be honest and as forthright as possible, so that it's very clear what our opinions are regarding the game.

[jmagnum50]

Interesting point, Apexmandalorian. There will always be something in a game that someone doesn't like, it happens. However, if there's something you like in a game or whatever, then that's good, good for you. If someone likes a game that others don't like, then that's up to that one player to decide, not a person or group to decide for that person. Best to agree to disagree.

[FcAc-No-Moe]

Not all of us. They don't deserve praise for content like that. Just like I don't praise them for the stupid Rainbow Six, Splinter Cell, Predator, and Terminator crossovers. Things that are done well will be praised, but not bad content. It also doesn't mean we'll ignore the good parts and treat everything like it's bad. That'll just mean that the next game is bad in some areas. The best approach is to praise the things that are good, and criticize the things that are bad, so that hopefully, the next game keeps the good stuff and leaves out the bad.

Perhaps you are correct and normally I do use some or most instead of all of you so for that I apologize, I did not mean to put everyone into the same category.

Personally speaking I don't consider any part of this game done well, not even mediocre at least, not the parts that make a proper GR experience game and the other parts, big but empty world, gear equipment galore, vehicles, weapon variants that means less than a zero to the left of importance for me to have fun.

Now, if you're so skeptical that you don't think there's even a small percentage chance that things will improve, why are you still here (generally speaking, btw)?

I am waiting to see what they are going to decide to do with the next game, this one is already dead and buried, again, TO ME, there is no amount of content or update, sans a complete rework of the core game and that would mean a whole new game, that will make this game stand on its own two feet and be considered a fun shooter, it will never be more than a mediocre (0r less) effort attempt to make a GR game.

And I am skeptical or negative not because I want to be but because of proof and facts on what they have done before and continue to do so before I change my mind, they need to man up and bring something worth talking about in a positive light.

Most new guys or people that just came in to play this game are going to defend it or even think they like it until the time that they are no longer here or they see the game for what it is and even though they have paid 10 dollars for it and not 60 bucks they are still going to complain.

I only paid 7.97 to Epic Games and only after the Immersive Experience came out because I read a few things here (from people I thought felt the same way I do about a GR game) and well, it really wasn't but I did not understand where they were coming from.

Then you have guys like Steven, Chris, Hugo and Mike who are Role Playing Gamers that will use their own ways to make the game fun but I don't do that, I will pay for something if it makes me have the fun that it says it will, just like I don't go to watch a movie and use my brain to have the fun I require to enjoy the movie.

And if you're trying to be so positive because you think they'll only listen if you praise them along with the criticism, then you're not being as honest as you should about what the problems are, meaning the next game will have the same problems. I don't think we should be rude in our feedback, but we certainly should be honest and as forthright as possible, so that it's very clear what our opinions are regarding the game.

I don't understand this part quiet well so I am going to leave it as is because I don't want to offend or answer something for the sake of answering but I didn't want to skip it so you wouldn't think that I only answer the things I care for.

[rugby_dog]

Clear no. Any time spent on zombies should be spent elsewhere.

There are lots of great zombie games out there so why would anyone actually want to play it.

[Xion-]

In the next Ghost Recon I wouldn't put it past Ubisoft set the parameter to fighting actual "Ghosts" with the way things are going I can foresee this in the future. It's not a far fetched concept for a company such as this. Just look at Rainbow Six Extraction. Rainbow Six has NEVER been about aliens and look what they've done to the franchise. Ubisoft will follow where the money goes regardless of anyone opinions. Now the new age is all about Zombies and Aliens. Thanks to the COD franchise. Now I did purchase the newest COD MW because it had a more element of realism than it's previous titles. I will not be buying Vanguard due to the fact it's a step back to the way they were before. I hated the COD series due to the loss of realism in the game, especially as it progressed. Now everything is Zombies, Aliens and twitch shooters. Not my cup of tea. This tactical industry is dying which is why I've been supporting an Indie dev team. They can not afford to make a mediocre pos like Ubisoft has been doing.

[Hugo-FOU]

What kind of zombies we talking about? TWD, 28days, Resident Evil, I Am Legend? Zombies range in category....

Or even Ubisoft employees?

[AI BLUEFOX]

Again my personal opinion is that it shouldn’t be put in a GR game.

But I like to try and play devils advocate and understand all sides of the arguement

The reason I ask is because someone mentioned the other day about (not on here) about some of the little things you could do in Goldeneye like big head mode and it got me thinking that as a purely end game idea that t they could add a similar idea?
In reality all I would be talking about would be effectively re-skinning the NPCs and slowing down their walking speed

The big head mode was already done on the original funnily enough. Once you finished the campaign you got some codes that would unlock a few modes with light hearted adaptions; a god mode, paper thin, where you and the team were as thin as paper, the big head mode and a chicken squawk mode were all the dialogue was chicken clucks.