🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #31
    Originally Posted by HORNlgorilla Go to original post
    well i'm just going to wait here till you to have a new brain and do researches and maybe a little grow up. Actually i'm starting to think you guys are really getting payed from someone or somewhere i don't think anime profile pictured people will waste their times here
    It's not true... But the idea of ​​getting paid, just to come here and say nonsense, I like.
    Share this post

  2. #32
    Gaser.'s Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,455
    Originally Posted by HORNlgorilla Go to original post
    well i'm just going to wait here till you to have a new brain and do researches and maybe a little grow up. Actually i'm starting to think you guys are really getting payed from someone or somewhere i don't think anime profile pictured people will waste their times here
    I think you the last to talk about growing up and having a brain, when you attack people for there choice of profile picture and ignoring that the entire answers you get are saying that your opinion is stupid and wrong.

    There is this saying: Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.


    So yeah get gud as they say or just give up and play something else instead. :P
    Share this post

  3. #33
    Originally Posted by Gaser. Go to original post
    I think you the last to talk about growing up and having a brain, when you attack people for there choice of profile picture and ignoring that the entire answers you get are saying that your opinion is stupid and wrong.

    There is this saying: Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.


    So yeah get gud as they say or just give up and play something else instead. :P
    It's not a choice that warlord's been weak and samurais been overpowered and the is no balance. I'm saying you are playing with overpowered heroes and you still defend them. Well also there are a little amount of realistic samurais in the game they are usually looking ridiculous and people that live in past they would think and they thought these were really ridiculous and For Honor is showing people that samurais are honored and too strong irl but tey are actually not.

    Kensei's sword is nearly never been used in past and because of it is too long, there was a little bit of balance so it was one of the most impossible weapons to use.

    Orochi is true in game but he doesn't do dodge attacks or turning-around attacks.

    Shinobi was real but chainless, he or she was just an assasin not used in wars.

    I don't have an idea about shugoki but i think he should be really really slow.

    Aramusha has two swords and this is the most ridiculous thing in the world, it's the hardest and the most impossible thing to use and it is not strong as u probably think. He does not even have an armor so he should die in literally a slice.

    Nobushi is a woman and there is literally no, i mean "No" woman samurai and this is one of the most impossible things in Japan. Women were used to enjoy people or serve their husbands. They haven't got a war responsibility. For her weapon, it was too hard to use something that long and she can EVEN attack from a farther distance with S+LMB this is impossible or if you even block her, she should be on the ground because of the balance, it's too hard to use it. Well i forgot something, she has no armor too. That should kill nobushi in one slice.

    Hitokiri is a woman again i'll just pass it. Her weapon, a male person can't even use her weapon because of it's weight it was too heavy well she can't do rolling attacks too.

    I can mention about other hero's unrealistic things but i have a film to watch right now so see you later, grow your brain up and do researches don't think samurais would be the best, weeb guy.
    Share this post

  4. #34
    Originally Posted by PicoAncus Go to original post
    It's not about my personal opinion. It has to do with what is historically proven or not. And the fact is that there is no example of chain Flail in any museum.

    Obviously there may be particular cases of individuals who may have made adaptations, as the Portuguese adapted an agricultural tool similar to a flail, but with a long handle, with a small chain, and a thorn ball that replaced a harvesting stick. wheat.

    I believe what you say, but...as I said, it's not about what I liked or not...

    But on a historical level, it has not been proven. Nor are there any copies in museums. And believe me I like this weapon.
    Nononono. No. This weapon was widely used on Czech territory from 13 till 15th (up to 17th) century. We actually learn this in our history classes. Are we all that stupid to not check facts for generations, or what is happening here?

    Are you unable to google? (Well i will give you benefit of the doubt, since the sources i use are in czech, so no point in me giving them to you)

    Look that thing up on youtube. There are multiple videos from multiple credible sources. They all agree that it was impractical, but very real.

    I get it. Czech is pretty small and rather insignificant. But if something is used only locally does not mean it did not exist at all... Jesus christ. And, believe it or not, there ARE EXISTING EXAMPLES IN OUR CASTLES AND MUSEUMS. I used my own mk II eyeballs to look at them in person.

    This riled me up more than it should...
    Share this post

  5. #35
    Originally Posted by manass92 Go to original post
    Nononono. No. This weapon was widely used on Czech territory from 13 till 15th (up to 17th) century. We actually learn this in our history classes. Are we all that stupid to not check facts for generations, or what is happening here?

    Are you unable to google? (Well i will give you benefit of the doubt, since the sources i use are in czech, so no point in me giving them to you)

    Look that thing up on youtube. There are multiple videos from multiple credible sources. They all agree that it was impractical, but very real.

    I get it. Czech is pretty small and rather insignificant. But if something is used only locally does not mean it did not exist at all... Jesus christ. And, believe it or not, there ARE EXISTING EXAMPLES IN OUR CASTLES AND MUSEUMS. I used my own mk II eyeballs to look at them in person.

    This riled me up more than it should...
    Buddy, im not calling you a liar or doubting your learnings.
    Im just saying what i read written in books and in documentarys, and they all say the same.
    There are no real artifacts of this weapon displayed in museums. The ones that exist are not from medieval times, they are modern, purpose-built for exhibitions.

    Dont blame me...blame historians that wrote and sad what i told...

    My country is small to, and as i told we (Portugal) used some variations of flail called "Mangual" with long cables.

    I did search on google with the name you provide and came nothing...
    I like that weapon, but as i sad, its not about my opinion
    Share this post

  6. #36
    Originally Posted by PicoAncus Go to original post
    Buddy, im not calling you a liar or doubting your learnings.
    Im just saying what i read written in books and in documentarys, and they all say the same.
    There are no real artifacts of this weapon displayed in museums. The ones that exist are not from medieval times, they are modern, purpose-built for exhibitions.

    Dont blame me...blame historians that wrote and sad what i told...

    My country is small to, and as i told we (Portugal) used some variations of flail called "Mangual" with long cables.

    I did search on google with the name you provide and came nothing...
    I like that weapon, but as i sad, its not about my opinion
    these maces may not be used in some kind of wars because it's a little bit hard to control but there are examples on history and as i know, these are known as ball and chain flail.
    Share this post

  7. #37
    Originally Posted by HORNlgorilla Go to original post
    these maces may not be used in some kind of wars because it's a little bit hard to control but there are examples on history and as i know, these are known as ball and chain flail.
    As i told...just modern replics. No artifact from medieval times.
    Research my friends...do some research... I did my research because i really wanted to find some evidence of the weapon existence. But all i got, was what i already told you...
    Share this post

  8. #38
    Allrighty then. I should be less agitated when debating on the internet. Lets agree to disagree here. I respect your opinion and agree with the uncertainity.
    Share this post

  9. #39
    I personally don't care about the realism stuff. I care about the fact OP thinks warlord is bad. He's S tier in 4s. And A tier in duels.
    Share this post

  10. #40
    Originally Posted by deathtocakl Go to original post
    I personally don't care about the realism stuff. I care about the fact OP thinks warlord is bad. He's S tier in 4s. And A tier in duels.
    of course he's not, everything he has is just a little bash and fastest stamina drain in the game go learn the game, weeb. I wouldn't say warlord is powerful if there was still a samurai class. and also this game's categories including realistic medieval.
    Share this post