It big business creating cheats for games some of the cheats for division 2 cost twice as much as the game no matter what they do a new cheat package will come out - ChronusMAX is updating their cheat right now because it stopped working which prove they are trying to stop it .
So tell us how to stop them - Ban them - they set up a new account and do it again it comes with the territory it won't stop them.
He can't tell you. Anybody who could has solved a certain core security problem (that of someone with physical control of a general purpose system) that the best minds in the world have not yet solved. (Nor does it appear to be soluble.)Originally Posted by BT3241 Go to original post
In collaboration with an anti-cheat, Massive should hire a real DZ police officers: in-game moderators.Originally Posted by BT3241 Go to original post
They sit in front of a server list and wait for a server to ping player report(s). Once a server has reflected a cheating or hacking suspicion up to a certain severity, they join the server without anyone knowing and are teleported towards the reported player(s). They proceed to watch the behavior, and can proceed to /ban [player name] without a trace. The ban would then be broadcasted in the feed. Some real anime stuff.
Pretty sure you can do this in Minecraft LOL.
Oh boy, that would be the easiest job in the world.
"Best minds" see thats probably what the executives think as well.
Everyone is fooled that this problem is difficult. It is not. We are talking A. Statistics and B. Anomalies.
There is nothing difficult about this except for having the infrastructure set up to begin with.
Nobody has ever been blindsided by a cheater issue. Unprepared because of corruption and ineptitude is different from being educated about the issue.
That would be a constant job, the Police Man thing. They most likely would ONLY be able to do that if people paid a monthly anti-cheat subscription. They would have to pay the people doing this pop in, spy, and good-bye stuff. They wont do that for free. Think people would pay for this or...Originally Posted by Merphee Go to original post
You're "solving" a completely different problem, and you're not really solving it, you're just throwing lots of expensive human power at it, at least if you want a very low false-positive rate. (In other words, not solving it at all if it has to be done on a budget.)Originally Posted by tmpn9x Go to original post