🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Far Cry forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #11
    We'll see how it goes.

    FC5 had a strange season pass. Vietnam was great, Mars weird but fun and zombies was the bad one. I honestly expected a new vietnam like DLC but i really played hours of Escape from Durgesh for the "thrill of starting over" so we'll see. Let s hope each dlc will have its unique world and enemies, and not just big arenas with waves of enemies.
    Share this post

  2. #12
    Originally Posted by WildCassowary Go to original post
    ....
    FC5 had a strange season pass. Vietnam was great,..........

    Vietnam was not great.

    Developers, don't make game or DLC regarding real wars!
    Because you'll have to take one of the sides.

    Are you sure that you're on the right side?!

    Are you sure that you won't be ashamed of it later?!

    Little poor country fighting against colonialism.......
    Why did you, developers, even get in there?!

    Next time, choosing setting for the game or DLC, be more careful.
    Share this post

  3. #13
    HorTyS's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    5,227
    The 3 settings of the DLCs from Far Cry 5 were all fan requested locations. I was happy to see them use those ideas for the DLCs in lieu of setting an entire game in one. Imagine if FC6 was a full game of the Mars DLC? bleech, happy to see them use those settings up in smaller scale endeavors rather than wasting a full fledged game on them.
    Share this post

  4. #14
    Originally Posted by GameGuru2018 Go to original post
    Vietnam was not great.

    Developers, don't make game or DLC regarding real wars!
    Because you'll have to take one of the sides.

    Are you sure that you're on the right side?!

    Are you sure that you won't be ashamed of it later?!

    Little poor country fighting against colonialism.......
    Why did you, developers, even get in there?!

    Next time, choosing setting for the game or DLC, be more careful.
    That s your point of view and personal opinion.

    You played a character from the base game so you were obviously gonna be an american.

    For a DLC, the small open world was really neat and i had great fun playing it.
    Share this post

  5. #15
    Originally Posted by WildCassowary Go to original post
    That s your point of view and personal opinion.

    You played a character from the base game so you were obviously gonna be an american.

    For a DLC, the small open world was really neat and i had great fun playing it.


    WildCassowary, it was the wrong setting for fun.....
    Share this post

  6. #16
    Originally Posted by GameGuru2018 Go to original post
    WildCassowary, it was the wrong setting for fun.....
    Once again, that s your point of view.
    See how many millions of players have fun on the fields of virtual WW2, from Battlefield to Call of Duty, Medal of honor etc, sometimes playing the nazis themselves.

    You're the one with the weirdest ideas all the time (i try to stay polite) but i'm sure that you realise that your statement is just your opinion. Go complain about everything if you want, but let others have fun as it s meant to be.
    Share this post

  7. #17
    SofaJockey's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3,077
    Originally Posted by GameGuru2018 Go to original post
    it was the wrong setting for fun.....
    I have empathy for GG's point, it's not fair to say that their opinion is 'wrong'.

    I didn't like chopping up whales in Assassin's Creed IV to make ammo pouches.

    Of course both of these things are just pixels, it's a game, but if you are immersed it's ok (and not weird) not to like things, though personally I found the DLC an entirely legitimate on for Ubi to make.
    Share this post

  8. #18
    Originally Posted by SofaJockey Go to original post
    I have empathy for GG's point, it's not fair to say that their opinion is 'wrong'.

    I didn't like chopping up whales in Assassin's Creed IV to make ammo pouches.

    Of course both of these things are just pixels, it's a game, but if you are immersed it's ok (and not weird) not to like things, though personally I found the DLC an entirely legitimate on for Ubi to make.
    I devoted my whole life to saving wildlife and preserving nature, meaning i spend my life far from my family, far from basic needs at leat 4 months a year (no water, no electricity, working 20h a day sometimes etc). I've been shot twice doing so, attacked countless times by as many creatures as you want, but i'd strangle a man (if allowed to) killing or hurting those species.
    Yet i was the first to hunt and skin the same animals i protect in FC3 and 4 (most species i work on were there). Because that s a game. None of us would kill a man in real life or wreck a car through someone's house. I can understand that some things done in game can make people feel bad but in the end, that s what it s meant to be: procure emotions. As long as it s done correctly, i don't mind playing a nazi during ww2 or an american during Vietnam. Some can feel offended by so and stay away, but these have to let others discover and experience those games as they please.
    Share this post

  9. #19
    SofaJockey's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3,077
    Originally Posted by WildCassowary Go to original post
    ISome can feel offended by so and stay away, but these have to let others discover and experience those games as they please.
    I think so. The DLC was telling a story about one of Hope County's characters' wartime experiences. It's entirely legitimate in my view.
    Share this post

  10. #20
    Originally Posted by WildCassowary Go to original post
    ......
    See how many millions of players have fun on the fields of virtual WW2, from Battlefield to Call of Duty, Medal of honor etc, sometimes playing the nazis themselves.
    ......




    It was not a War, as WW1 or WW2, it was a Genocide.

    Big and powerful country, far across the ocean, came to another small and poor country to genocide it.
    The fault of that small country was that it didn't want to be a part of the system developed by a powerful country, to be more precise by its ruling class.

    Those who dare to do this pay a high price.

    Merciless, hypocrisy, cunning of the system has no limits.

    Fault of the Vietnamese was that they decided to be a socialist country.
    Capitalism doesn't forgive that.

    Vietnam genocide needs not Russel Tribunal but Nuremberg Tribunal.










    Such a slaughter was not a one-time thing.
    It had industrial scale.
    How many villages have simply dissapeared - for not to leave any witnesses.





    Part of the answer is here....













    Even Nazis didn't do that.
    Share this post