GR: Wildlands Remastered!! | Forums

[Church367A]

I think the people who are raging about the remastered Mass effect trilogy price are dumb, because if they were to buy the games with all their DLCs for PC would be more expensive than 60 dollars

Not only that, but they have to find some way to make up the money they were expecting from Andromeda and Anthem.

[ArgimonEd]

I dont think it's a bad price.
For 10 year old games, they handle really well and have a much better gameplay than many games of today.
With the remaster, all DLCs and new things they announced that they were going to put in the game, I think it's a good deal, specially for the people who never played the game

[Kean_1]

Personally, I rather they go back to OGR, add 2020 graphics, make the maps slightly bigger, make an effort on enemies and teammate AI and call it a Remaster or Call it Behemoth if it gives the studio a big woody but for the love of all that is pure and beautiful in this world, no more Wildlands.

For that, just skip the above, fix the Wildlands we already got and charge 9.99 for the upgrades and call it a day.

To be honest, if they went back to linear gameplay I'd likely be done with the series. The open-world genie is out and WL proved enough folks would accept the change to still make the franchise really successful. Now, if they would have simply improved on the formula that made WL good instead of getting rid of it, I think they would have had a hit on their hands vs. this mess they called Breakpoint.

I know there are a lot of fans who want missions focused on smaller maps, etc. but there are also other fans like me who think GR can still work in an open world like WL. Then again, there are fans who loved Future Soldier which, if that vision made a return, would just as easily kill off the series for me. I just can't see going back.....personally.

[ArgimonEd]

Me neither, but what I understood from what he said bigger map is turning them into open world ish

[AI BLUEFOX]

To be honest, if they went back to linear gameplay I'd likely be done with the series. The open-world genie is out and WL proved enough folks would accept the change to still make the franchise really successful. Now, if they would have simply improved on the formula that made WL good instead of getting rid of it, I think they would have had a hit on their hands vs. this mess they called Breakpoint.

The original was as open world as they could get it at the time and the freedom to move around the map was a fundamental feature. If the originals were exactly the same mission designs and layout but all on the same bigger map it would enhance it not reduce it in my view.

I think you're right, the genie is out and I can't see the franchise going back to linear maps. A few smaller "worlds" where you deploy to different regions around the globe for several missions on the same campaign could be a good alternative to a single world.

[Rafi-KtC]

I just want the stupid spider sense to be gone

[Church367A]

Again, just going to throw out the setup from MGSV in how their maps while not anywhere near the area of Breakpoint or Wildlands were still sufficient. Given something like that, preferably even cover a slightly larger area and have separate locations across the globe would be a nice change in my opinion. I find it difficult to repeatedly come up with different locations in the world where you can have a diverse set of environments all in the relatively general location such as what was provided with Bolivia in Wildlands. In my opinion, the only solution to that challenge if there is a desire to maintain that diversity in a single game is with a map setup such as MGSV. The other option being having full DLC or new game expansions with a new location. Either way I'd be happy, assuming attention to detail for gunsmith, gear, and AI are present in the game along with missions that make sense.

If a Wildlands remastered game came out right now, I seriously doubt I'd buy it just because for me there is nothing wrong with going back and playing Wildlands right now. Give it another two or even three years and then I would be interested in it assuming it came with additional improvements aside from just better graphics.

[Rafi-KtC]

Again, just going to throw out the setup from MGSV in how their maps while not anywhere near the area of Breakpoint or Wildlands were still sufficient. Given something like that, preferably even cover a slightly larger area and have separate locations across the globe would be a nice change in my opinion. I find it difficult to repeatedly come up with different locations in the world where you can have a diverse set of environments all in the relatively general location such as what was provided with Bolivia in Wildlands. In my opinion, the only solution to that challenge if there is a desire to maintain that diversity in a single game is with a map setup such as MGSV. The other option being having full DLC or new game expansions with a new location. Either way I'd be happy, assuming attention to detail for gunsmith, gear, and AI are present in the game along with missions that make sense.

If a Wildlands remastered game came out right now, I seriously doubt I'd buy it just because for me there is nothing wrong with going back and playing Wildlands right now. Give it another two or even three years and then I would be interested in it assuming it came with additional improvements aside from just better graphics.

MSGV was rushed/took to long (why did it took you so long snake?) we know it from leaks.

GRBP was also rushed, but you can't compare both unfinished products, MGSV is far superior even if it feels you just played the half of the plot.

[ArgimonEd]

Again, just going to throw out the setup from MGSV in how their maps while not anywhere near the area of Breakpoint or Wildlands were still sufficient. Given something like that, preferably even cover a slightly larger area and have separate locations across the globe would be a nice change in my opinion. I find it difficult to repeatedly come up with different locations in the world where you can have a diverse set of environments all in the relatively general location such as what was provided with Bolivia in Wildlands. In my opinion, the only solution to that challenge if there is a desire to maintain that diversity in a single game is with a map setup such as MGSV. The other option being having full DLC or new game expansions with a new location. Either way I'd be happy, assuming attention to detail for gunsmith, gear, and AI are present in the game along with missions that make sense.

If a Wildlands remastered game came out right now, I seriously doubt I'd buy it just because for me there is nothing wrong with going back and playing Wildlands right now. Give it another two or even three years and then I would be interested in it assuming it came with additional improvements aside from just better graphics.

For me it feels unfinished (but a billion times better, than BP) and I just wanted the suggestions from this thread to come as an year 3, fully finishing WL

[winspector_24]

Game is 3 years. Move on! We need a Future Soldier remake, with Division's "open world".