Is Assassins Creed still worthy of the name?

I post this here because on YT I don't take people serious.

-If we go in real specifics only AC 1 is about the assassins.
But they made a story that ended with AC 3.

-I myself gave black flag a pass when I got to the end, where Edward becomes an assassin.
I do think they should've made at least a second game with Edward in England but alright.

-Then we have Rogue, and that game makes us understand AC 3 better, and sets up the story of Arno.

-Unity gave me a lot of hope for the future of the franchise.
*The parkour mechanics became very nice.
*The fighting mechanics became way better, not perfect but 100% better then block once and kill everything spamming the square button.
*The options to change your looks was very good.
I thought in the next games we could change even more. (Shoes,shoelaces,gloves,shirt and change the colours of all separately).
It could only become better with each game, but no.

-syndicate knife fights was good, climbing became trash with that 007 rope thing that brought you to the highest point in 5sec.
Changing the character became trash again, could only change the outfits.

-origins made the game fresh again, the timeline made sense to be the origins of the Creed.
They should've gone Ezio with this game and made a trilogy with bayek.
*level system in a story driven game... Meh.
*I did think it was weird fighting gods in AC.
*I expected way bigger dungeons in the pyramids for some reason.
*Stealth was gone or didn't work for me, I killed 1 dude and the whole camp was alarmed.
I let myself die to start over, it happend again and again.
From that point I went God of War 3 the whole game.

*Fight mechanics in my eyes trash, even worse then black flag/rogue/3.
I know people are gonna say, you don't like it,because it's more advanced (Its really not).
(It's 4x square button to attack, push circle to roll away/avoid getting hit, push circle to roll back and repeat.) Same as black flag but slower because there are no killstreaks.
That's why I liked unity's fight mechanics, they should've improved that.
------------------------------------------
From here I don't call this franchise AC anymore.

-Anyway oddessy....not a good word for this one.
*The only thing related to AC is the first hidden blade (And that's in a DLC).
*Timeline before Origins... so Origins ain't Origins?
*no good story
*You are not an Assassin/Hidden one or Spartan, you are a mercenary, something the assassins use to distract enemy's right.
(I know Ezio's uncle is an assassin and mercenary but that's why he's an npc, and you are not playing as him.)
*So no sick looking Spartan mixed with AC outfit.
Yes you can put on a hood but no iconic Master Assassin outfit.
*Again fighting gods/mythical beasts.
*Again hack/slash fight mechanics.
*Again no stealth.
This game feels more like God of war 3 then AC.

I deleted the game after I killed the minotaur,medusa and cyclops.

-valhalla didn't play this one after I felt scammed with oddessy.
*heard you fight witches now.
*hack/slash, roll away, roll back, repeat.
*wasn't really clear if you could assassinate with one hit again or that your blade was like a mosquito jab if your not the same level like origins/oddessy.
*heard no Templars or what later is know as Templars (Bishop Heahmund).
*No iconic master assassin outfit. (No hood)
Don't give me that bs like, Assassins don't need hoods to be assassins.
They do because the hoods are an AC thing!!
Just like bald men in suits are the Assassins in Hitman.

Anyway do you guys and girls agree or not?
Do you only agree with some points?
Let me know, I like to see what others think of this.