🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Ghost-Recon forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #1

    No More Crossovers - We Want Original GR Content

    Terminator, Splinter Cell, Rainbow Six, and now Tomb Raider?

    This game is more largely made up of other games than it is made up of itself.

    Scrap the Tomb Raider content and add ORIGINAL Ghost Recon content!

    There is literally an entire island towards the East of the map that we can't travel to. Is it ever going to be used? What's over there?

    Enough with the crossovers. Please.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  2. #2
    Icetyger4's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    1,124
    Agreed. If I want to play games from other franchises, I will. The fact is, I don't want to do that. Especially while I'm playing Breakpoint. Why are Ubisoft trying to shoehorn these franchises into their other games? The answer is brand awareness and the almighty dollar.

    Considering Breakpoints narrative, with Nomad being stuck on Auroa with no possible way off the island, how are these other characters getting on and off the island so easily? And why can't Nomad just simply leave with them?

    I enjoyed the new DLC and crossover content, but I think it would've been better to work within the constraints of the main campaign's narrative. The franchise characters could be replaced with Outcasts and Auroa residents, who have been investigating and training specifically to complete these missions and help free Auroa. This would've made a lot more sense than having other franchise characters turning up out of the blue, to complete a secret mission that Nomad couldn't even find one tiny clue about as he's exploring Auroa.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  3. #3
    While I am not against the crossovers themselves (I loved both Terminator and Splinter Cell crossovers), I do think the are core updates with Ghost Recon Breakpoint itself that should be the highest priority. But as "Operation Amber sky" showed, Ubisoft is not very willing to invest to properly improve the experience with Ghost Recon Breakpoint.
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Keltimus's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    D.C. area
    Posts
    1,327
    I agree, the cross overs have to stop. Counting non-Ghost Recon related content since WIldlands... Predator, Splinter Cell, Rainbow 6, The Division 2 (audio content)... now Breakpoint... Terminator, Splinter Cell (again), Rainbow 6 (again), Tomb Raider.
    Share this post

  5. #5
    Keltimus's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    D.C. area
    Posts
    1,327
    I should also mention, the the Ghost Recon Future Soldier and Rebel DLCs in Breakpoint only had Bodark and Rebel character customization items and weapons. So just about every DLC in Breakpoint had content to make you Ghost anything but a Ghost.
    Share this post

  6. #6
    I don’t think people would mind any of the live updates if the game was In a polished state but when there are loads of bugs and game play additions that are needed it just seems strange for them to waste all this time making terminators / tomb raiders and rainbow 6 operatives that we will only ever use the once.

    We don’t want a bunch of different game modes . Let’s just make one mode that is fun.

    We bought this game to play ghost recon after all....
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  7. #7
    I wonder if why we had radio silence from Ubisoft is because they know the community doesn’t want any of these cross overs they have planned . I mean I would have delayed the tomb raider news for as long as possible if I was Ubisoft as that was always gonna go down so well !
    Share this post