Warmonger's corruption | Forums

[Goat_of_Vermund]

Yeah, nerf her big time man

I wouldn't call it a nerf, she is balanced. It just has to work differently.

[WolfenTank]

I wouldn't call it a nerf, she is balanced. It just has to work differently.

Maybe give other heroes the ability to receive an instant vaccin or wear a mask so they don't get infected by the corruption when they are standing next to each other?

[Goat_of_Vermund]

Maybe give other heroes the ability to receive an instant vaccin or wear a mask so they don't get infected by the corruption when they are standing next to each other?

Or they shouldn't stand next to each other.

I really don't like how she creates dead zones where you can not enter because you die, but honestly, her corruption uptimes are not long. It is hard to balance, because the first three feats are built together, ff they are not working, they are thrash. Quite hard to tell how it would work well. It is something definetely worth a TG.

[TrondurIGotu]

Like I said in the original post, its a feat that can be pretty strong if used precisely, but then its gone. Its no different that Fire Flask or Catapult, which, let me remind everyone, is a 1 hit kill no mater your health.

[TrondurIGotu]

I am not trolling, I think feats should be a little strong. They are suppose to be rewards for playing your role in 4s and should turn the tide of battle when used properly. Otherwise whats the point of having them anyways

[Goat_of_Vermund]

If you are not trolling, you are geniuenely on the level of a troll if you compare catapult to corruption.

[TrondurIGotu]

You have done nothing to add to any coversation other than insulting me anytime I post any opinion no these forums.

[Goat_of_Vermund]

If you say something so clearly stupid, don't expect a complex reply. That must be earned.

[TrondurIGotu]

I expect someone to support valid arguments and talk like an adult. Instead of calling someone stupid for an idea they posted, how about explaining why the idea is stupid rather than insulting the person outright.

[Gaser.]

I expect someone to support valid arguments and talk like an adult. Instead of calling someone stupid for an idea they posted, how about explaining why the idea is stupid rather than insulting the person outright.

Well only can join in with Goat on that.

Extremely stupid opinion gets extremely stupid answer.