Warden's thick blood was a passive feat unlocked at tier 2 that completely negated everything about multiple character kits with no counter play other than, welp use something else.
I for one like the idea of kensei's unique tier 4 feat. Its strong yes but its a tier 4. As a tier 4 its actually on the weaker side when things like fire flask exist. Also unlike fire flask, theres considerable counterplay that any character can use such as spacing, parrying ect.
Comparing these 2 feats isnt fair, a teir 2 to a teir 4. A passive vs an activated feat.
Originally Posted by Saint_YeetsXB Go to original post
I actually think a healing banner or centurion's shield counters it too. Unless every single heavy hits, the Kensei won't outdamage the healing/shield before the effect runs out. He also doesn't get unlimited stamina. It is very strong if the opponent is forced to fight him while he has it, but Shugoki's staggering one is actually far stronger if you want to compare Thick Blood to a strong T4.
Thick Blood would have been broken even if it was a T4.
U can dodge kensei lights or attack first or parry, plus only heavy and light finishers are uninterruptible which means as long as you dodge the opening attacks you can land a hit without getting punished. So kenseis feat is not op or whatever... but I don’t really think thick blood was that op either. I guess it is for peacekeepers since they can’t do unblockables without bleeding. But even then, it’s not as if they’re defenseless.
All I have to say about this is:Originally Posted by TheRubyHero Go to original post
1. You have no idea how valid Gaser's opinions are. He is a far more respected member of these forums than you will ever be.
2. I'm going to be honest here. I've never seen you in the forums before. This is the first post of yours I've ever read and it is incredibly obvious how misinformed you are.
3. If you are upset about the removal of thick blood, then you obviously abused it for your benefit and now you're just getting ruined by bleeders. I love it.