that's true, far cry never makes fictional games, only realistic games, so I thought that a game where it can be adventures where it never ends would be the bestOriginally Posted by HorTyS Go to original post![]()
that would be weird right?Originally Posted by BackPa-CZ Go to original post
Yes that would be greatOriginally Posted by RobertEmerald Go to original post![]()
I forgot about Turok.Originally Posted by HorTyS Go to original post
How so?Originally Posted by Ma_Doctor049 Go to original post
They're all fictional. In Far Cry 1, you're stranded on a mysterious archipelago in the South Pacific full of trigens. In Far Cry Instincts and Far Cry Instincts Evolution, you're in a remote archipelago 'Jacutan' filled with mercenaries, pirates and mutants. In Far Cry 2, you're in an unnamed African country that's heavily based on Kenya. In Far Cry 3, you're in the Rook Islands based on the South Pacific. In Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon, you're in a dystopian future in the year 2007 that's a parody of action movies of the 1980s. Far Cry 4, you're in Kyrat. In Far Cry Primal, you're in Oros located in Europe. In Far Cry 5 and Far Cry New Dawn, you're in Hope County. In Lost on Mars DLC, you're in Mars. Now we're in Yara in Far Cry 6. They are all fictional games located in fictional locations based on real world locations. The only realistic locations would be Hours of Darkness DLC and Far Cry New Dawn's expeditions. Hours of Darkness is set in Vietnam but even the level design is mostly fictional based on the Vietnam war. The expeditions located in Navajo Bridge, Alcatraz Island and the I.S.S. are the closest things to realistic locations. Although they are just post apocalyptic versions of their real world counterparts.Originally Posted by Ma_Doctor049 Go to original post
You do realize you could just have all of your responses in a single post, right?
Originally Posted by Ma_Doctor049 Go to original post
Far Cry is fiction itself.
Sci-Fi can't be meaningless!
It's a projection of the future based on scientific ground.
Fantasy can be meaningless.
Good Sci-Fi Far Cry is Must Have!
But Sci-Fi, not a Fantasy.
That's why Sci-Fi Far Cry should avoid Fantasy in the game.
Fantasy will spoil it.
The most bright example of fantasy is - Star Wars.
Total Trash.
Generations grew up on that trash and making movies and video-games for us, now.
As for a bad tribe taking over the Australian area...
Ubisoft won't do that! 100%.
Actually Far Cry Instincts gave you animalistic powers and FC Blood Dragon is one of the best in the series and it's far from realistic. Also Far Cry New Dawn isn't realistic either... I think it'd be a mistake to try to limit FC to only realistic settings, but I also think pushing dinosaurs into it is not the most interesting unrealistic scenario they could go with.Originally Posted by Ma_Doctor049 Go to original post
I know, but some are not realistic at all because they put nonsensical things, like fantasy, I just love everything that is realistic, although some can be a theory, like far cry new dawnOriginally Posted by KrayZee_ Go to original post
at least you have to know that fantasy is useless, I like science fiction, but my idea in a game that is in Australia would be great, but what evil enemy is there? it will be a mysteryOriginally Posted by GameGuru2018 Go to original post![]()
lose, how about far cry they show things from mythology, like the yeti from far cry the valley of the yetisOriginally Posted by HorTyS Go to original post
Originally Posted by Ma_Doctor049 Go to original post
Yes, Ma_Doctoro49, its rather hard to imagine....
Only some poachers come to mind.
After southern Far Cry 6 .....may be nothern Far Cry 7?
With nothern nature.
Not like Far Cry 4, semi-nothern and semi-southern.
But just Nothern.
In this case we have 2 options:
Arctic circle:
And Antarctic circle:
May be leave Australia for later?