🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #1

    Realism

    A more realist game like it was advertise in 2015-2016 at the E3 would have been a million time better !


    Realist battle with only one blow being needed to fatally wounded someone


    All this **** is not fun... and not even good enought to be considered illigible for competition !


    Even mortal kombat make more sense in term of competition... complex combo and allways a way to reverse the fight and stop your opponent combo...

    For honor... spamfest, hidden indicator, bomb everywhere,fireflask, bash bash bash ,4v1 etc let me laught ...LOL
    Share this post

  2. #2
    Okay, so, realism:

    1. You did not go from one blow in reality. If you had armor. Which means every character without armor can go to the bin. Also, weapons like the katana can go to the thrash as well, since they don't do **** to any real armor (you don't have to be a weapon expert to understand that, they are made from the same material, it won't cut through it). So, the only weapons allowed are probably maces, halberds, poleaxes, warhammers.
    2. 4v1 in realism would be even more simple: the one dude would be tackled to the ground, the third one would open his/her helmet, and put a dagger through his eye. Spam would still be an issue, and if you would be down, they would bash you to death in the end. Oh, and if you want realism, in real life, there are no indicators.


    Also, just write in French, put it in google translate, and put it here. It would have better grammar.
    Share this post

  3. #3
    Gaser.'s Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,455
    Ah yes you mean this thing that was just a completely motion capped movie and only really a proof of concept.


    Looks incredible boring and most likely to be a even worse turtle meta then we had in early season. (Honestly just go to Mordhau and only play in third person lol)


    But hey interactive emotes would be cool.
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Well, realism... to a certain extent I agree.

    We don't need thinks like this in the game in my opinion:
    1. The enemy is about to get executed but still he/she somehow conjures a flute out from the ether for him/herself, acts like an idiot for a couple of seconds and then gets killed.
    2. My hero puts his/her weapon away in a middle of a battle, does the magic hand trick and turns the enemy into a tree.
    3. Using some steampunk gadget to blow up the opponent.

    BUT

    I think that a fully realistic medieval fighting game will never happen, because of the reasons the others mentioned. It wouldn't be fun (one serious injury to your sword-arm or legs and you're out from the fight. You can go to heal which takes 8+ days if not several weeks) however the main purpose of games to provide fun.
    Also, people play videogames because they can provide fun in ways which real life couldn't. The only way to experience realistic battles is to truly fight in them, and that is a situation what I'm not wishing for anyone.
    Share this post