🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Ghost-Recon forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #1
    Greko0's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    21

    More siege operatives ?

    Are we getting more R6 Siege operatives like in wildlands ? Pls !!!
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  2. #2
    Keltimus's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    D.C. area
    Posts
    1,327
    I hope not. I thought we were playing Ghost Recon, not characters from other Ubisoft titles?

    I would much prefer new character features added like new faces, voices, and call signs to expand the Ghost team, not an R6 team.
    Share this post

  3. #3
    Greko0's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    21
    Originally Posted by Keltimus Go to original post
    I hope not. I thought we were playing Ghost Recon, not characters from other Ubisoft titles?

    I would much prefer new character features added like new faces, voices, and call signs to expand the Ghost team, not an R6 team.
    I am beeing realistic and asking for something possible and already done in the previous title, while you are asking for something they will not do.
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Icetyger4's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    1,124
    Originally Posted by Keltimus Go to original post
    I hope not. I thought we were playing Ghost Recon, not characters from other Ubisoft titles?

    I would much prefer new character features added like new faces, voices, and call signs to expand the Ghost team, not an R6 team.
    I'm with you Keltimus. Having more operatives from other Ubisoft titles show up on Auroa doesn't make any sense. Auroa is an island made inaccesible and unescapable by defensive drone technology. This is explained in the games narrative and shouldn't be ignored just to add new characters with new events.

    Originally Posted by Greko0 Go to original post
    I am beeing realistic and asking for something possible and already done in the previous title, while you are asking for something they will not do.
    Ubisoft has added new cosmetics and characters from other franchises to their games in the past, so it's not unrealistic to think they'll continue to add more of both in the future.
    Share this post

  5. #5
    Greko0's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    21
    Originally Posted by Icetyger4 Go to original post
    I'm with you Keltimus. Having more operatives from other Ubisoft titles show up on Auroa doesn't make any sense. Auroa is an island made inaccesible and unescapable by defensive drone technology. This is explained in the games narrative and shouldn't be ignored just to add new characters with new events.



    Ubisoft has added new cosmetics and characters from other franchises to their games in the past, so it's not unrealistic to think they'll continue to add more of both in the future.
    Its easyer for them to do it , siege operatives was a success in wildlands ,and that defensive technology theory goes straight to the meh bin since the arrival of the certain 3 siege operatives ,Ash ,Finka,Thatcher , not to mention the splinter cell dudes. also a few more are purchasable ,so my point was why stop there ? Let us have them all .The more the better.
    Share this post

  6. #6
    Keltimus's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    D.C. area
    Posts
    1,327
    Originally Posted by Greko0 Go to original post
    Its easyer for them to do it , siege operatives was a success in wildlands ,and that defensive technology theory goes straight to the meh bin since the arrival of the certain 3 siege operatives ,Ash ,Finka,Thatcher , not to mention the splinter cell dudes. also a few more are purchasable ,so my point was why stop there ? Let us have them all .The more the better.
    First, as Icetyger4 just explained, it's not easier. It goes against the narrative of Auroa's lockdown. Second, if it weren't for the fact that Sentinel has Auroa on lockdown, the USS WASP has been standing by off the coast with more Ghosts ever since Nomad's chopper went down a year ago. They would be sending in more Ghosts, not R6. 'Because they were in Wildlands' is a poor excuse. The storyline in Wildlands was more of a personal vendetta narrative for Caveira. In Breakpoint, Rainbow 6 isn't really needed on the island as Nomad and his team can already handle it. Lesion would have only been a consultant to Scott Mitchell's ear while Scott Mitchell radios in the mission to Nomad. That's how it should have played out, through chain of command. R6 boots on the ground were not needed at all in any of the Amber Sky missions.

    The ONLY excuse as to why R6 is in Breakpoint is for Ubisoft to advertise.
    Share this post

  7. #7
    Greko0's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    21
    Originally Posted by Keltimus Go to original post
    First, as Icetyger4 just explained, it's not easier. It goes against the narrative of Auroa's lockdown. Second, if it weren't for the fact that Sentinel has Auroa on lockdown, the USS WASP has been standing by off the coast with more Ghosts ever since Nomad's chopper went down a year ago. They would be sending in more Ghosts, not R6. 'Because they were in Wildlands' is a poor excuse. The storyline in Wildlands was more of a personal vendetta narrative for Caveira. In Breakpoint, Rainbow 6 isn't really needed on the island as Nomad and his team can already handle it. Lesion would have only been a consultant to Scott Mitchell's ear while Scott Mitchell radios in the mission to Nomad. That's how it should have played out, through chain of command. R6 boots on the ground were not needed at all in any of the Amber Sky missions.

    The ONLY excuse as to why R6 is in Breakpoint is for Ubisoft to advertise.
    Well i don't really care about lore ******** , i like the r6 operatives and i want more.
    Share this post

  8. #8
    At this point, I think Ubi needs to focus on the gameplay. More options in dealing with enemies, for example.
    Share this post

  9. #9
    Greko0's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    21
    Originally Posted by AMITYPREDATOR75 Go to original post
    At this point, I think Ubi needs to focus on the gameplay. More options in dealing with enemies, for example.
    Define dealing with enemies...

    More takedowns ? More stealth takedowns non lethals ?

    Also pls all siege operatives as skins thaaanks !
    Share this post