Assassin's Creed III Remastered is controversial. Nostalgia for the good old Assassin's Creed and surprise at how far the game graphics have progressed over the past seven years. 2012 was quite recently, but it seems that a thousand years ago, in a completely different life. The gameplay of Assassin's Creed III looks today anachronistic, and the graphics, despite the efforts of Ubisoft Barcelona, ​​do not reach modern standards.

So, Assassin's Creed III Remastered supports 4K and HDR on PlayStation 4 Pro, Xbox One X and PC, and 1080p on older versions of PlayStation 4 and Xbox One consoles. The lighting system has undergone an update, texture resolution has been increased, plus some minor improvements in rendering have been made. The problem is that, of course, no one altered the character and object models themselves, this is a very costly process, comparable to developing a new game.

Story missions were also not affected. Yes, they are already doubly good, the scriptwriters obviously did not write to their colleagues help write my essay, because they themselves coped with everything perfectly.

As for the reworking of the gameplay, in the originally action-oriented Assassin's Creed III, the updated version paid more attention to the stealth passage, improving the character's disguise. Now you can hide in the bushes, whistle your opponents and commit double kills, just like in other games in the series. In addition, the game menu was revised, the economy was rebalanced, etc.