Senior Member
Banned
Banned
Scotts actually right. Every one abuses Adventure Mystical meta decks. Nothing but 3x incan craig lazers with pope and DAR. Why is Call Girl and Pope 6 Cost cards? Dark Angel ability to resummon 5 Cost cards at 3 cost energy is a joke. Her ability is better than popes or Call Girls. Call girl can only summon hero cards so what with the 6 Cost energy price tag when DAR is a 3 cost and summons any themes cards. 2nd why is Adventure theme the most op diverse theme out there. It almost has something from all the other themes. Mystical? Sharon heals all units by a op amount of health. SciFi? Big Murphy Freezes cards with his attack. Randy? Pocahontas hits the fastest and deals the most damage of all 5 Randy Cards available. Only theme in a 1 on 1 with his legendary counter part where a level 4 and 5 Indian Randy kills a level 4 legendary 6th Randy. You have Stan of Many moons who has been the most controversial card in the game after the completely op Buff he got 2 years ago up untill you made Frontier Bradley the new op meta for the deck. Now every adventure theme makes you pic an impossible decision where you either wait and kill Stan or wait and kill Bradley only to be screwed by the other. Now with DAR its all but impossible to counter. Uses Angel to resummon level 3 and 4 Ican Craig's that decimate your hole defensive strategy against Pocahontas with Frontier right behind him. If you group your cards to kill a tank or adult card you killed by Incan's op lazer attack. Adventure theme is by far and has been for the longest time the best over powered theme in the game. Best cards. Most diversified ability's with cards like Sharon. Whens SciFi getting its healer card? When does hero theme get a healer card? What about Fantasy? Red needs to be a 6 cost card. 3 cost with her op ability gives mystical way to much value. Especially when paired with Ican Craig. Hes right. Same two META decks ruling the field. Screw every one else as long as the players in the top tiers are happy right? Its not that they dont read these post guy from the 1st pair its just that they dont care as long as Adventure and Mystical remain the seeded top tier themesOriginally Posted by ScottOld Go to original post
Banned
Has any one else noticed that the so called ballance changes are a joke at best? The Visitors where the most useless card out there unless it was at least 3 levels better than any one else's like having them at the time at level 4 or 5. So they Buffed theme during the cards main stream release to the rest of the players in the game when they gave away 200 copies during the 2nd Battle pass the invasion. Then they nerf (returned) the card back to its or close to its original stats. Did the same with Space Warrior. He was giving a buff to make him more relevant than nerfed him. Same with Gnom's. They Gave Stan Of Many Moons the games biggest buff 2 years ago and its been a constant point of discussion ever since till they silenced it. I'm pretty sure if you go back and look at most of these nerfs with maybe a few exceptions where just actually cards that got buffs and have been returned to close of not the same as they were before the card was buffed. So what are we really actually asking for? Only cards to start with nerfs have been the bradly cards and Super Hero cards. Except for Frontier. It makes since they would give Adventure theme the most powerful Bradley yet. Just wait till they make the Mystical version omg. Personally im tired. Its a head ack. Nothing ever really changes in this game. Adventure and Mystical will continue to be the dominant decks in this game. If you want to win just conform to the meta. The point of Super Hero cards was they were supposed to be super.... They were supposed to be better than normal cards. Then they nerfed them to just kids in costumes.... My advice play a different game like I do. I still play this one but when it becomes to much I have other better (FAIRER GAMES!!!!) to go to
Senior Member
Banned
Your useless presence with posts that add nothing to any discussion but just dismiss others without argument is something that doesn't seem to change either. How can you tell of others but not of yourself? Welcome, hypocrisy.Originally Posted by camelchasers Go to original post
Senior Member
Senior Member
Haha yeah, someone seems happy to see you... :POriginally Posted by camelchasers Go to original post
Banned
Quoting myself because is so embarrassingly obvious. How can you say 'sorry you take it personally' right after you posted merely to call on another user and not to discuss anything?Originally Posted by Nousella Go to original post
I am calling out your hypocrisy which should be obvious to yourself too, this isn't more or less personal than anything else I or anyone could have said. Maybe because I used the word useless? That's no offence, its the quality of your post which you made solely to call useless the user before you.
I see the quality of your reasoning and all is clearer. All in all what you say is on the same level of Scott thinking 'Frontier is fine', just a non sense biased stubborn illogical puzzles of locutions and I understand why at some point the conversations you join end up in circles.
Senior Member
Haha, well I guess I’ll consider myself called out then. Looking forward to our next debate (I assume you’ll open up a rant about adventure again soon?).
But seriously, you don’t think it’s funny that Mike has been banned like 20 times and he keeps posting the same things with alt accounts each week in giant blocks of text? I think it’s hilarious.
