Hi Ubisoft.
I am a huge fan of Far Cry series. And as a fan, I am looking upto Far Cry 6 with great excitement and expectations. I want Far Cry series to be one of the best games in the world. One problem that I find in Far Cry series is that it is like a fast fashon. It still has a fair player base but I want it to be an evergreen game like CS:Go , etc.
It surely have huge potential, So, to make it a great game, that potential should be converted into kinetic. And I have few advices for it.
Advice no.1 New game mode : Battle royale
One major quality factor of a good battle royale game is it's environment, it's location. And I think this is a speciality of Far cry games. The locations of Far cry games are the best that any other game does not have. I think Far cry is the perfact game to have a battleroyale mode.
Advice no. 2 A story mode extension or a DLC : Villain's Back story
The one thing in which Far Cry series stands out is it's Antagonists. This is the best thing about Far Cry series. People Love the antagonists , they have their own fanbase.
People want to know more about them. They want to explore them. And their is nothing better own storyline. I think that people will be more intrested in antagonist's story than the actual one.
Well, thats it. I hope that the representators of Ubisoft would read my thread.
If any of the representators read this, please reply back. I want to know your thaughts about my ideas.
About release date: Please take your time to make a good game and don't compromise with quality.
THANKS
Antogonist's story, at least its main idea will be simple - "Sorry, friends....But in general, I'm not a bad person. Hard circumstances forced me to behave like that. You'd do the same if you were me!"
People are always self-justifying.
The same would be with Far Cry 6 villain. Moreover he is a dictator.
What a dictator usually sais?
"NO ME - NO COUNTRY!"
Sometimes it is really so. Sometimes not.
But every dictator implies it with words and actions.
Every dictator puts this thought in people's mind.
And many people in dictators' countries really think that way.
Dictators always brainwash its people.
Dictator always think about successor.
He's trying to protect himself after his rule.
Ideal - his son.
But in modern times it looks not nice. It should be somebody else - it should look democratic.
It should be someone very loyal.
If he will doubt in his loyalty one day ..... there is always dirt on him.
There is no need even in dirt - common interests, common boat will do its work.
Modern dictators don't build monuments of themselves.
They're against such monuments.
To build monuments, to leave his son ......"No,no. It's for Dictators! But Me ..... I'm democratically elected president!"
Dictatorship itself is very complicated thing.
For a current period of human society and its development - it can't be without dictatorship.
It will be always dictatorship concentrated around one person or dictatorship of group of people.
The main thing is - in whose interests dictatorship is carried out.
In the interests of majority of people or in the interests of minority.
The most striking examples: Dictatorship concentrated around one person - North Korea. Dictatorship of group of people - USA. (big business, corporations)
In first case dictatorship is carried out in the interests of majority of people.
In the second - in the interests of minority.
Everything is not so simple and evident. World is not - Black and White.
It doesn't mean that every dictator that concentrated power in his hand is acting in the interests of majority of people.
They all say that they're acting in the interests of majority.
Every dictator is not Kim Jong Un.
Kim Jong Un - is another system.
Mostly modern dictators are acting in the interests of minority. Oligarchy, big business....
So will be with Anton, I think.
But at the same time he will contradictory and controversial figure.