Member
+1 to thread post. MC shouldn't affect totems. It looks like defects of testers team.
In my opinion, all over the world whether it's a book, a film or a game - everywhere everything is based on the knowledge of reality and logic. For example, if in a book people can do miracles or can fly it is always explained either it is magic or it is scientific inventions. If, for example in the film, I see that the tree does not burn from the fire without any explanationS I have it will cause questions and moreover it will cease to be interesting.
Senior Member
Well... if you're looking for a specific answer to your reply....Originally Posted by B1rdm4n77 Go to original postWow that's kind of a non-answer to my reply, 'nuff said
No, I've never seen a drone going around striking thunderbolts. Many of the units in the game defy physics or reality, so a certain level of suspension of disbelief is needed when playing this game, just the same as when watching a sci-fi film or TV show, or reading superhero comics, etc. This same suspension of disbelief thus allows for other cards to affect (or not affect) certain units based on in-game rules that may or may not match real-world physics.
My previous response that you initially replied to was intended more as a tongue-in-cheek response to the claims about how Thunderbird should interact with Drone or Coop based on his interpretation of the physics, to point out that his interpretation is not necessarily accurate. Since it's a game, they can make up their own physics. They set out rules on how different things are supposed to interact or be affected, so as long as it is consistent with those rules, real-world physics need not apply.
