seriously, Conqueror has to be the cheapest duelist right now. Not the best, the cheapest.
His zone attack is basically the only big issue atm. Way too safe.
It can be used as an Option Select at the same time as having an almost immediate start up, with superior block properties, and offense. It can be used to defend against just about any input the game has to offer.
In a 1v1 scenario, it's just wayyyyy too reliable for such a small risk. The risk is a heavy parry that doesnt even have a good parry window, and the reward is total defense and it interupts actions simultaneously.
How is it ok to have an action that can option select, superior block, and attack, all at once, with such little risk? Its fast enough to negate most gb attempts too.
With the 100ms missing indicator, this move feels lightning quick to activate and almost impossible to see coming. Ridiculous.
This coming from a big supporter of the CCU. I love the new mechanics, but stuff like this needs some looking into.
Nydardoloth has no idea what he's talking about. He always posts opinions that everyone hates.Originally Posted by HiTeHa Go to original post
You can throw heavies with a conqueror, if you think they are parried, bash softfeint, if you think they will dodge attack or optionselect, fullblock. Also, you are pretty much forced to go for light parries against him.Originally Posted by Nydardoloth Go to original post
The "can not use this in 1v1" argument is weak. Here is a short list for things you can not:
1. Any unfeintable forward dodge attacks (safe for roll punish in some cases).
2. Out of lock moves (safe for Warlord bs).
3. Bash into the not guaranteed heavy followup.
4. Lawbringer's longarm.
5. Warmonger's side dodge heavy.
"If you wanna be able to beat a Conqueror, just put 30 or 40 or 50 reps into the character, that's it!!"Originally Posted by Nydardoloth Go to original post
Oh how super simple that is.
Dude, everyone hates your opinions because you post things like you think you know the game better than anyone else, yet everyone here who knows a lot about the game can clearly tell that you have ZERO IDEA what you're talking about.
Dude, if you require 20+ reps with a hero before you learn how to play as them or against them, then you are just god awful at the game and again, you are only negating your own credibility.Originally Posted by Nydardoloth Go to original post
Nuff said.
Conq is S tier because top players say it. Because you kill the Conqs in "non-ranked" matches does not mean that the Hero is weak.Originally Posted by Nydardoloth Go to original post
I wouldn't say that. He has decent pikemen clear, and is very hard to move out from an area if he chooses to entrench himself there. Definetely not top pick.Originally Posted by Frozty85 Go to original post