USA underpowered. My improvements. | Forums

[Reef_Eng]

Great post here, 100% agree - we need more people to play USA - Fact. I think they need an oil tap depo also in my opinion. I noticed the income takes AGES to accumulate?? I don't understand what I'm supposed to do during this time, they need to increase the income to compensate for the hefty unit prices!

[angus725]

Originally posted by darthviadro501:
USA suck balls, proof:

I'd rather not be on the German side when these show up.

[KillaJules]

A Tiger tank would have to be very unlucky to be destroyed by a P-47 Thunderbolt. The rockets were very inaccurate and the machine guns are never going to pierce the Tiger's armour except by fluke.

As to gameplay balance, the US is mostly fine, but the Pershing should have the same range and firepower as the Panther. Super Pershing should have the firepower of the Tiger, not King Tiger and the Jackson should be $25.

[saminskip]

and I'D rather not be The Joker when THESE guys show up.

[Covert-141]

Originally posted by KillaJules:
As to gameplay balance, the US is mostly fine, but the Pershing should have the same range and firepower as the Panther. Super Pershing should have the firepower of the Tiger, not King Tiger and the Jackson should be $25.

LOLOLOLOL

[kierentod12345]

How is USA underpowered??? they have a good armoured AA which is in the AA base, they have alot of cheap good units and they have very good tanks compared to other factions apart form germany, they also have overpowered prototype missile lanchers which can kill tanks and has good range.

I believe UK is the most underpowered. They need better tanks as all there tanks suck and there only good AA and AT is way too expensive. The firefly AT cost 25 each and costs 100 to research it..... way too much and its not even the best AT. there assult gun cost too much as it has poor range and is too slow. Also the UK armoured recon (upgraded one) cost too much to research and produce. So basically all the good UK stuff costs too much for what its worth. Whereas 60 for a super heavy tank for germany/USSR/USA is more worth than 40 for a crap churchill ( advanced heavy tank).

So really the USA is better off.

[dunkle0steus]

Originally posted by kierentod12345:
How is USA underpowered??? ....

Oh r'ly?

[Dreepa]

Erm, I usually dont do this, really, I dont, but this is a classic case of l2p.

I did both beta tests, and I still remember MASSIVE critique on US, cause they were in fact really dominant. They still are one of the best factions. There are still many threads out there asking for US TD's nerf and other things. I really cant see how US is underpowered.

[warshark4355]

Have you read the first post lol. I think it a joke post. Troll

[wu-scherge]

Originally posted by Dreepa:
Erm, I usually dont do this, really, I dont, but this is a classic case of l2p.

I did both beta tests, and I still remember MASSIVE critique on US, cause they were in fact really dominant. They still are one of the best factions. There are still many threads out there asking for US TD's nerf and other things. I really cant see how US is underpowered.

actually average soldier is a good player.
i know as a fact, that he thinks US is OP.
this thread is pure irony.