Early signs of this game´s fate | Forums

[Goat_of_Vermund]

Mordhau gives a more natural blend between reading and reaction by allowing a manual adjustment of animations, imho thats a better and more entertaining fighting game than the current state of for honor, which is sad because mordhau doesnt even try to be a serious game but more of a big comedy

So? Play that if you like it more.

[Goat_of_Vermund]

The devs havent implemented anything you cried for in this forum. Not a single thing but keep lying boy.

If you claim I am lying, prove it.

[Knight_Raime]

Mordhau gives a more natural blend between reading and reaction by allowing a manual adjustment of animations, imho thats a better and more entertaining fighting game than the current state of for honor, which is sad because mordhau doesnt even try to be a serious game but more of a big comedy

Unfortunately mordhau lacks the polish that FH has. You know, the kind of feel you get from a triple A experience. Not only that but it's not a very comparable experience to FH.

FH is more of a Moba lite/fighting style mix where as Mordhau is a first person semi authentic medieval experience. It doesn't appeal to me in anyway shape or form. Even if it handled the balance of reaction and read play better its simply not at all comparable to what fh is.

Which is exactly why all the claims of it going to quash FH ended up dying on the wind instead of coming to truth.

[rocks.cl]

So? Play that if you like it more.

This is one of the stupidest answers i have seen in this forum and there are big ones, anyone could have considered the option of maybe reaching a better blending of reaction and reading in FH but what this clown over here tought about was "well it you find post CCU FH boring then stop playing it" hahaha its so stupid it made me laugh XD see what i mean when i say that these people are pushing FH into a Niche of a Niche?

[Goat_of_Vermund]

This is one of the stupidest answers i have seen in this forum and there are big ones, anyone could have considered the option of maybe reaching a better blending of reaction and reading in FH but what this clown over here tought about was "well it you find post CCU FH boring then stop playing it" hahaha its so stupid it made me laugh XD see what i mean when i say that these people are pushing FH into a Niche of a Niche?

Well, if you find this stupid, then the conversation's level is finally on the level you deserve.

The thing is, your only "valid point" is you find the game less fun now. Many players find it more fun than it was, I wouldn't go back to staring contest again. Maybe you would, but it is quite clear for a while the game is going this direction, they want unreactable offense. So yes, if it is not fun for you but have nothing else that would solve this problem, and you have found a better game, play that game instead. Very simple.

[rocks.cl]

Well, if you find this stupid, then the conversation's level is finally on the level you deserve.

The thing is, your only "valid point" is you find the game less fun now. Many players find it more fun than it was, I wouldn't go back to staring contest again. Maybe you would, but it is quite clear for a while the game is going this direction, they want unreactable offense. So yes, if it is not fun for you but have nothing else that would solve this problem, and you have found a better game, play that game instead. Very simple.

You have been unable to read properly before, but this time you are obviously "intentionally misssing the point" and attacking a "scarecrow" because no one even being drunk could miss the so clear and easy to understand "maybe reaching a better blending of reaction" thing i wrote there which couldnt in any universe have anything to do with "return to a stare contest", thus here you are obviously trying to sabotage this thread, and you dont even deserve my attention anymore so go stroke your e-pen elsewhere please, you are not a contribution in any rational way, and what is worst is that you are even more boring than FH post CCU

[Goat_of_Vermund]

You have been unable to read properly before, but this time you are obviously "intentionally misssing the point" and attacking a "scarecrow" because no one even being drunk could miss the so clear and easy to understand "maybe reaching a better blending of reaction" thing i wrote there which couldnt in any universe have anything to do with "return to a stare contest", thus here you are obviously trying to sabotage this thread, and you dont even deserve my attention anymore so go stroke your e-pen elsewhere please, you are not a contribution in any rational way, and what is worst is that you are even more boring than FH post CCU

Okay, I write it as simple as possible, so even if you are as stupid as you act like, you will be able to understand (I might be willing to make some drawing if it is still too difficult).

The game is more fair this way than before. It is clearly different than before.

Having fun is your responsibility. If you don't like the game, watch your cartoons then or do whatever you want. Nobody cares about you being bored, and balancing should definetely not be done based on it.

[rocks.cl]

Okay, I write it as simple as possible, so even if you are as stupid as you act like, you will be able to understand (I might be willing to make some drawing if it is still too difficult).

The game is more fair this way than before. It is clearly different than before.

Having fun is your responsibility. If you don't like the game, watch your cartoons then or do whatever you want. Nobody cares about you being bored, and balancing should definetely not be done based on it.

get out of here kid, and stop sabotaging threads that you are unwilling to actually participate in, who do you think you are to spam fallacies left and right, arrogant little troll

[Gaser.]

get out of here kid, and stop sabotaging threads that you are unwilling to actually participate in, who do you think you are to spam fallacies left and right, arrogant little troll

So having a opposite opinion is sabotaging?

[rocks.cl]

So having a opposite opinion is sabotaging?

Repeatedly exercising and presenting "intentionally missing the point" and "straw man" like if you were making an argument is not having an opinion but being an *** hole, troll, and yes a saboteur