Russian optics | Forums

[Grimsdottirr]

Well its clear and obvious how often the Mods here are surprised when the player base says "We like darker maps" and "add dynamic lighting" or "Why not add NVG mode" and such. Not all of us care for the Proleague, Neutered game.

[Grimsdottirr]

I've only intereacted with a few of the same mods so I figured I'd probably be wrong on that assumption as I don't actually know how many there are. And I'm well aware that they have no say as to what goes and such. But yeah, they can pass on a ton of our suggestions of what the community wants but it seems that proleague always gets their way. I mean the devs themselves said openly they wanted this to be an esports game from the beginning. So obviously they're gonna treat their golden goose with the finest feed of the land. But screw the other chickens.

[DarthCynical]

Quite possibly the most unnecessary and ridiculous planned removal since night maps and everything to do with the great Chinese censorship kerfuffle. The russian optics are all I use when it's an option.

[Grimsdottirr]

I hear Pro League said the Optics were "uncomfortable". Which to me makes zero sense. They're nice and clear, how are they uncomfortable. If this honestly the reason, I'm not ever giving Siege a shred of money in the future.

[Much_Luck]

I hear Pro League said the Optics were "uncomfortable". Which to me makes zero sense. They're nice and clear, how are they uncomfortable. If this honestly the reason, I'm not ever giving Siege a shred of money in the future.

If you look at the operators that Pro League players use. None of them involve using Russians and their guns. When you use 99% of the time only one type of sight, then the 1% of the time you dont use that sight is when you are uncomfortable with them. Pro League players are not going to use the Russians and if Ubi does make this change, they still won't use the russians.

[Pulu.]

I hear Pro League said the Optics were "uncomfortable". Which to me makes zero sense. They're nice and clear, how are they uncomfortable. If this honestly the reason, I'm not ever giving Siege a shred of money in the future.

Where did you heard that? I cant find single news or clips.

And what you mean that PRO LEAGUE say things, there is not such a thing. Its esl and ubisoft league so it comes from them, not PRO LEAGUE. Esl has more than only pro league, there is challenger league too and community cups etc.

[Grimsdottirr]

Where did you heard that? I cant find single news or clips.

And what you mean that PRO LEAGUE say things, there is not such a thing. Its esl and ubisoft league so it comes from them, not PRO LEAGUE. Esl has more than only pro league, there is challenger league too and community cups etc.

I don't follow any of that. There were a few threads a while back. I grant it is most likely just herese for I've asked and looked into it and I've also found bunk so I don't know where the first person got it. It was mentioned with cosmetic changes susposedly coming up with the newest year from a few threads and out of everything, that made the least sense and people attributed it to someone complaining.

[Grimsdottirr]

is it just me, but it sometimes feels like Ubi reps, bless their heart, will reply every other thread but leave out others. Is it because they have no answer? Feedback would be nice regardless of Expertise. Its kinda annoying.

[immafish_YO]

I don't understand why would they remove russian optics?? It's part of the operator which scopes you can attach to their gun. It's like saying you should get same secondary gadgets to all operators in my opinion.

[Y4MA]

they should just give us more optics options.