I can agree with that perspective, you are correct in thinking that if there were enough people fed up with Division 1, then Division 2 would not have happened. My counterpoint would be that the market for cover-based looter shooter is lacking quality options in my opinion and promises were made from the first game to bring back some that may not have returned.
I didn't feel you answer was toxic or negative, you want to understand where my perspective comes from. It's natural
I was in Division 1 since launch since I love the genre, I left very early on because of the issues that were happening with the game but returned after a year or more (not sure the exact time frame) to a game that was incredible and revitalized my yearning for the game again. When I started hearing more about Division 2, I was excited and, like many, believed that the same issues would not transfer. Also taking in consideration the devs and media claimed that 'they heard us and they would not repeat the issues on the first one' (not a direct quote).
It's undeniable that we have a certain amount of the population that complains loudly, others that defend loudly, some that will continue to play and some that won't but there are those who silently decide as well whether to continue or not and whether the new franchise will be purchased at inception, later in its life or not purchase at all. One thing to note, I watch streamers and enjoy the entertainment but I can honestly say they do not represent the population I am part of that is for sure. It's going to be interesting to see how Massive will react to the noise or maybe we have already seen...
