There's a few likeable faces in the division 2 unlike the first game where there was 8 faces and I only liked one, This time I like 4 of the faces for female out of 12 heads (head 4, head 5, head 8 and head 9 even on the male side they're decent too with head 2, head 7, head 8 and head 12, How come they didn't do this with division 1?
Well to be fair games that look worse are still being released occasionally.Originally Posted by Eirihein Go to original post![]()
arg, sorry, i forgot the cubes of minecraftOriginally Posted by Escritores Go to original post
Why did it take them to make a division 2 to make better faces when they could have done it for the first division game like this character creation is more likeable than the first games character creation, Look at the male faces head 2, head 7, head 8 and head 12, For the female faces look at head 2, head 4, head 5 and head 9 i like them a lot where as the first game I didn't like any on either genderOriginally Posted by Escritores Go to original post
"Check other games, even a couple years old, to have an idea how to make female faces people will like using"?Originally Posted by Eirihein Go to original post
While at it, do the same with cosmetics.
ok i see, i must overlook the heads in several games and compare them with the predecessors.Originally Posted by xBloodySin Go to original post
PS. i would not play the game, that i visually would not like
A graphical designer should be up do date with what other games push out, as part of their job, to have a baseline to aim for. It isn't even that the faces on both Division games are low quality. They are well-made, but for some unknown reason (SJW'g maybe?) purposefully made unattractive, which is mind-boggling. It would be understandable if the options covered a wide spectrum of comeliness, but that's not what we are offered.Originally Posted by Eirihein Go to original post