Luckily some of us who love and play your game are attorneys in the real world, and I noticed you changed your TOS”terms of service” just recently in the last few hours.
So, just to be clear... your banwave & rollback was implemented on Mar 30th roughly 7:00am PST, your TOS at that time/moment did not include the words: rollback, forfeiture, surrender of partial accounts. It states “ban/suspension”.
Legally updating your TOS on April 3rd to include the phrase “rollback”, holds no bearing legally to your Mar 30th “rollback”. If accounts are in fact rolled back to a previous save date, and players/customers accounts are partially forfeited, you are in violation of the contract you entered into the consumer with, and the entire contract/TOS is completely void.
You are well within your rights to ban and/or suspend accounts. As well as rollback any consumers account that violates your April 3rd TOS “after” April 3rd, Rollbacks do not apply to any accounts before April 3rd.
I hope it doesn’t go this far Ubisoft, I for one love the division, but my office is ready to represent any player/consumer who is caught in this “rollback” move. Have a good day
You do realise they can change those ToS at any time for any reason. and It's also our responsibility to check the changes. (we signed a contract with that in.)
When we install the game we sign a contract then and there Via a EULA (it's Automatic) the problem is no one reads it so they have not got a clue what it all says and means.
Some of us do read it.
Actual lawyers send actual letters, with actual letterhead... not forum posts. I also doubt anyone with the forum name of 'hellskids' is holding any professional job that doesn't involve a spatula or a shovel. So what is the goal? to get these accounts perma banned? instead of rolled back? THAT is your argument?! smh.
Do we need to hire a judge here now?Originally Posted by SuspiciousPixel Go to original post