This post mainly analysis the problem of The division 2:Warlords of New York
What news had Warlords of New York bring?
>Story of Aaron keener,Gear 2.0,New Gear set,New York open world area,seasonal reward and event
So what reason make The Division 2's bad word of mouth?
>http://<u>https://www.metacritic.com...f-new-york</u> >>> User Score:0.4
There are some disadvantage of Warlords of New York:
Bug Bug Bug......-many bugs
Unbalanced enemy strength-challenge,legendary,heroic too difficult
Too many hacker-DZ's hell
Bad drop rate and quality
......
But none of the above is the worst!
The worst is Official response.Massive was the first studio to ban players who are using bugs at scale.What?There are ban the player who are using bugs instead of who are hacking in this game.It is ridiculous to hear that.In my opinion,this expansion cost 30USD 200HKD 800TWD.That is a half price of the main game.But what we get? Bugs , crash , unintended difficulty and so on.Also, seasonal cheat can't get excellent equipment.That mean players will play this game in nightmares.But are these all our problems?not necessarily.In an official attitude to problem solving,the dps bugs existed for at least a month(Discussion data display).But the official did not actively fix it.And finally blame the player.Apart from the inefficiency of fixing bugs,It took time to block players instead of improve the game.If all this time is spent fixing bugs.This is really much.
Other than that,they don’t have much innovation in the game,such as level design,system.it can be made from the original version.So this update is no different from a year pass,not creative.Really sad and disappointing.Because it sold 30USD.Price and quality are not directly proportional.During this month,I don’t know what I played.This expansion pack did not surprise me.It also made me lose hope for the official.This is the official way of doing things.So is this game worth us to play?
No.Originally Posted by iamSpecter Go to original post
As so much else in your incoherent ramblings that is incorrect, try again.