Junior Member
Just to be clear, I'm no social justice warrior. I'm just angry I spent alot of money and you promised one thing but delivered something different.
Hey Eric Couzian, stop. Just stop. To Emil Daubon, David Gallaher and Nouredine Abboud, I won't be buying another game if your names are on the list.
Dispite your attempts to fix this horrible game. It's still not the breakpoint experience anyone or I wanted. Wildlands was amazing! I miss having at A.I Team mates and little things like holster your weapon. It's all gone!
You still have promo A.I. squad posters/videos, yet they're still not in game? So that's a flat out lie.
You have really ugly faces and not a whole lot of variety of hair styles for women. BTW what happened to the Fury pony tail in the promo posters/videos? Another lie?
Even tho I stopped playing at under 25hrs last year, I really didn't get a lot for my one year pass! Or does this have to do with more microtransactions?
Please understand all of my questions here are rhetorical questions, exceptions for devs only.
Ubisoft Paris, it's a no from me.
Member
Junior Member
I tried the Beta and I'm glad I did, then because of the beta I decided to not buy the game, definetly at full price. I wrote in the survey that if they are going to release the game like this, they should prepare for a huge failure and that Tom Clancy would turn in his grave.
After a few months they announced the "immersive mode" and then I thought , well I will give that one a try and purchased the standard edition at a discount (I wouldn't have spent more than those 20€) and I have to say it got alot better. Not good enough to justify a 120€ price tag for the ultimate edition, but for 20€ I'd say I can recommend it.
Sure, there are still problems, like you said, the mission AI team mates, or the fact that the game still grounds on the concept of a looter shooter and therefore the skilltree still has stuff to contributes to that system.
But I have to say that they did a great job on the small things, to the details. Like the weapon check the character does once in a while, the animtions for interacting with the environment. I also find the graphics amazing and also there the small details, like the little glare effect when everything is covered in snow and the sun is shining. And there's so much more.
All in all I think it's a good game and the developers did a good job. I guess the bad guy in that story is Ubisoft, who wanted to milk the playerbase too hard by turning the game into something that appeals to as many target groups as possible without taking the core of Ghost Recon into consideration. They simply wanted a game that sells well.
If you see it from that perspective, I guess the dev team tried their best to make the best out of it.
If someone of the dev team reads this: Good job!
If someone of the financial department reads this: S***w you and your greed. Listen to the guys who develop the game and know their community.
If the guy who is responsible for the "looting" part in the game reads this: I hope the ghost of Tom Clancy haunts you in your dreams.
