Give us some ghost coins for free, you swindling lowlifes. | Forums

[bn38416]

Nearly every aspect of this game still has some issue or another. I still don't have binoculars, movement bugs still exist, faction missions are still screwed, auto shoulder switching STILL gets us killed when brushing up against walls in firefights, and I don't know if you have gotten down from a cliff lately, but it's pathetic.... THE LIST GOES ON.

I bought a game that you said had survival elements and you have pretty much 86'd that whole concept. Not even sure why you kept a stamina bar. You promised less arcade-style, more tactics, and you either lied or let it be swept up and reconsidered amidst all the incompetence.

This game is sad, plain and simple. I reinstalled for the terminator update, I realized how much lower the bar is for this game than pretty much all other major titles in my library. You could have just made a wildlands 1.5 with updated movement and enemy AI, and everyone would have thrown money at it.

This sucks, it's as simple as that. You'll make more content for us to purchase in your crappy game before you fix it.

Yall need a come-to jesus-moment. I'm never giving you guys pre-order money ever again. Next ubisoft game I get, if ever, will have been out for a year (so it will have a chance to actually work) and heavily discounted (for when it actually doesn't )


Scam artists clowns.

[Lekter_LTU]

Well, ubisoft makes updates fro breakpoint. Updates which are too few and far between. Updates which not only not address the bugs, but somehow make them worse... and introduce new ones, too. It almost seems like they are doing it on purpose just out of disrespect for people who bought their game. If actions speak louder than words, then ubisoft utterly hates their customers. Breakpoint is broken beyond repair at this point and more entertainment can be found in the forums, than in the game. I bet ubisoft moved on to work on their next cash-grab title right after breakpoint flopped on release, anyway.

[GamerCZ84]

I am wondering how well will their next games do.

I dont care about their delayed release. I am not buying anything that comes out in 2020 and 2021.

Breakpoint showed that even delayed releases makes no difference.

They pushed it out,so the dust will settle and they will release the same copy paste games again. I want them to get back on track but to help them do that I have to spend elsewhere. Weird for common sense, but thats the only language non gamer leadership understands...

[L0VEBOMB]

Breakpoint showed that even delayed releases makes no dferenceif.

It didn't, it's what lead to a change of direction in their studios.

Don't mistaken incompetence with inability, because Div2 team is very much capable of making a gg. Same goes for the latest AC. While its completely obvious that Breakpoint devs never played Wildlands nor the current game to test things out. They were literally shown a wildlands trailer, said copy that and left out all the goods to present a game with no soul.

The only thing that will show if delayed releases can make a difference are future games from here on out. BP was never delayed to change the formula.

[GamerCZ84]

Thats funny you say that. Because Odyssey was basically my breakpoint with Ubisoft.

Odyssey is not AC game and is incredibly bad and grindy spongy MMORPG like crap with poor writing and really poor animations and combat. AC one had better animations and combat than this garbage... (except for sprint animation)

What they showed next... FC, WD, gods and monsters, breakpoint etc are all the same games only in different cloth.

They will not change anything that actually matters.

Thats why I am saying that by 2020 we might get a quality title.WD Legion, new AC are too far in production to actually change everything that matters. This delay they annouced is not providing enough time for rework those games need.

Ubisoft needs to build series from ground up and understand and respect its DNA to build a good game again...

I hope they will find a way back as it used to be my go to studio every year...

[L0VEBOMB]

Because Odyssey was basically my breakpoint with Ubisoft.

Yours, but the sales sing a different tune. So your individual, personal experience and feels towards it.... Do not matter!

AC are too far in production to actually change everything that matters.

I'd not take your word for it. You are just sucking these things out of your fingers with no actual proof. Yes they are invested at this point, but if they delay it back so far, a lot can be susceptible to change.

[GamerCZ84]

Yours, but the sales sing a different tune. So your individual, personal experience and feels towards it.... Do not matter!



I'd not take your word for it. You are just sucking these things out of your fingers with no actual proof. Yes they are invested at this point, but if they delay it back so far, a lot can be susceptible to change.

Your logic would be correct if next title sells well. Until then its just your opinion which by your words does not matter.

Me as a AC fan who owns and finished all titles is broken by Odyssey. And I am not going to blindly pre order AC ever again. And if you think I am the only one then you are very very mistaken. AC community is completely divided by Odyssey.

Next title still has chance for good sales. Not because it was delayed, but ONLY because it is made by Montreal studio. Because AC fans have high hopes and respect for Ashraf and his team. If nothing else the story telling and characters will be excellent. Because Montreal loves AC unlike Quebec who hates every foundation of this franchise and mocks hardcore fans at every corner.

If it was Quebec again I would bet with you that it would be a disaster just like Breakpoint.

These are things to consider too


But lets stop it here. This is Breakpoint forum not AC. I respect your opinion and will not try to change it.

Afterall as I said I really hope they get back on track and inject life back to their games which I loved for several years...

[L0VEBOMB]

I didn't say my opinion towards it matters either, by "you" it is the general "you" not you as a person. The success they had agrees with their strat, the game was received pretty well. Divided or not (it doesn't matter because the demographic reaches beyond us). Im someone who has literally enjoyed every AC (except the initial third) game since AC2 and while some things are subject to change or there's room for improvements i liked what they did with origins and odyssey to revamp the series. after recently playing ac2 again which was great i still think looking back, nostalgia kicks in for the most part. great and timeless classic but i liked how far they came ever since.

We'll see how it goes yeah Don't think they delayed AC, it was pretty clear they'd take a 2 year interval to develope the next rather than going year by year. even though, u realise the games have been in development way longer than that.

The Montreal vs Quebec i can't fully agree with. The question i have for you is, how far did you play Odyssey? Did you finish it? If so, did you play through all dlc's?

Didn't have a problem with Syndicate, nor Odyssey or Brotherhood. Each was enjoyable with an entirely different feel. Im a sucka for revisiting a different time in history. Syndicate definitely the least interesting to me personally in the whole series, i still had fun in the playthrough.

Montreal on the other hand delivered Unity. If one looks past the initial launch drama of Unity, even that felt like a great game to me, the french revolution was a great choice, and in the city of love, having a love story in the ac games it felt like a nice twist on the series to me. But according to you.. Montreal wouldn't have delivered a disaster, but Unity, was at launch, a complete mess. Still a gg in my humble opinion.

You see.. its not all like you put it.


As for BP:

Well... (all they had to do was create wildlands 2.0.. not world 2.0 which is actually more like world 1.5)

I wished they'd implement stealth mechanics from BP into WL, along with a few other things from fallen ghosts dlc, more vehicles and improved carry mechanisms etc. Basically the good stuff from BP. Add it all into the blender with WL and remaster that game and it would be canon. Seems like too many steps backward and with bugs and the lack of progress i think its become immeasurable damage to the game itself and rep.

[MEGABRETH]

They knew the game wasnt ready for release but they released it anyway. In the beginning i was under the impression that they wanted to make money on the release, to pay the developers to finish the game. Im positive now, they are completely incompetent, lazy and do not care about the gamers who who spent $60-120 upon release! If they cared they would have worked hard, day and night to have a functional game. Instead theyre rolling in our dough and paying lil wayne to do promos. **** that, fix your ******g game or full refunds to all gamers you crooks!! You are NOT entitled to our money!! C'mon now!? GR Breakpoint has been out since october. **** assasins creed, rainbow 6 and any other title u plan to release, until your developers fix this game i spent over $120 on!! You have the nerve to spend our money to pay your ******g lazy *** developers to release more half assed titles.

[GamerCZ84]

I didn't say my opinion towards it matters either, by "you" it is the general "you" not you as a person. The success they had agrees with their strat, the game was received pretty well. Divided or not (it doesn't matter because the demographic reaches beyond us). Im someone who has literally enjoyed every AC (except the initial third) game since AC2 and while some things are subject to change or there's room for improvements i liked what they did with origins and odyssey to revamp the series. after recently playing ac2 again which was great i still think looking back, nostalgia kicks in for the most part. great and timeless classic but i liked how far they came ever since.

We'll see how it goes yeah Don't think they delayed AC, it was pretty clear they'd take a 2 year interval to develope the next rather than going year by year. even though, u realise the games have been in development way longer than that.

The Montreal vs Quebec i can't fully agree with. The question i have for you is, how far did you play Odyssey? Did you finish it? If so, did you play through all dlc's?

Didn't have a problem with Syndicate, nor Odyssey or Brotherhood. Each was enjoyable with an entirely different feel. Im a sucka for revisiting a different time in history. Syndicate definitely the least interesting to me personally in the whole series, i still had fun in the playthrough.

Montreal on the other hand delivered Unity. If one looks past the initial launch drama of Unity, even that felt like a great game to me, the french revolution was a great choice, and in the city of love, having a love story in the ac games it felt like a nice twist on the series to me. But according to you.. Montreal wouldn't have delivered a disaster, but Unity, was at launch, a complete mess. Still a gg in my humble opinion.

You see.. its not all like you put it.


As for BP:

Well... (all they had to do was create wildlands 2.0.. not world 2.0 which is actually more like world 1.5)

I wished they'd implement stealth mechanics from BP into WL, along with a few other things from fallen ghosts dlc, more vehicles and improved carry mechanisms etc. Basically the good stuff from BP. Add it all into the blender with WL and remaster that game and it would be canon. Seems like too many steps backward and with bugs and the lack of progress i think its become immeasurable damage to the game itself and rep.

I finished Odyssey 100% base game. I didnt have a stomach to touch it once they increased the level cap. I had enough grinding and they added 20 more?

Watched the story on YT... what is more hillarious that passage of time at the end of first DLC?

Imho AC team is looking to get more sales so they target grindy audience and they are willing to lose old fanbase which holds them a bit hostage because they demand weird things like assassins, templars, hidden blade in Assassins Creed game...

Unity is imho the best game in the series in regards of gameplay and graphics and level design. I played it only after it was patched as my PC could not handle it when it released. It still has some bugs yes, but the game was heavily stealth oriented and I loved it. Story could have beren better, but honestly wihout Desmond its hard to pull off as Modern Day is a mess and I would scrap the whole Layla...

We shall see what will future bring but I am convinced that 2020 will still deliver poor games.

2021 and 2022 will have games with a new DNA imho. Thats when I will check back and maybe spend so.e money here again Unless I get some game for free again haha. I bought 2 GPUs last year so I got Div2 and Breakpoint for free.

Regarding Div2 I would say it was quite ok game. I definetly like its cover system 50x more than Breakpoints. I only dont understand PVP in Divisions. I delt no dmg to anyone yet I died instantly. I guess I would have to grind some PVP gear and min max to be competitive.

For now I sm more than happy with MW. Their new 65gb patch is awesome. They just make the game more and more awesome with each patch.