🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #1

    Does conqueror need a buff?

    With bp pretty much a better conq 2.0. I was curious if u guys think he needs one. If he does what and why? I personally think he needs a small buff to stack up better against bp.
    Share this post

  2. #2
    Originally Posted by The_Wanderer_I Go to original post
    With bp pretty much a better conq 2.0. I was curious if u guys think he needs one. If he does what and why? I personally think he needs a small buff to stack up better against bp.
    Conq is pretty strong right now I think. I only got like 8 hours of playtime with conq but I frequently get deleted by really good conq players so it doesn't feel like he really needs a buff. In fact i'd like for his dodges to not make his shield glow white and play a sound effect as right now, any dodge can be mistaken for a bash almost.
    Share this post

  3. #3
    Originally Posted by The_Wanderer_I Go to original post
    With bp pretty much a better conq 2.0. I was curious if u guys think he needs one. If he does what and why? I personally think he needs a small buff to stack up better against bp.
    how come in every post about the conqueror needing a buff the black prior is cited as justification? i'm not agreeing or disagreeing about the conqueror needing a buff, i just want to know why these 2 characters are regarded as similar. theyre played completely different
    Share this post

  4. #4
    There is more similarity between a Black Prior and a Warlord than between a Black Prior and a Conqueror, if we are looking for the playstyle. Lorewise, of course, lot of their members would probably fit well in each others' orders.
    Share this post

  5. #5
    Originally Posted by AmonDarkGod Go to original post
    Because they both bash
    *sad 'Horfðu á mig'*
    Share this post

  6. #6
    I think conq would be less clunky if he could feint normally for me It's sorta pressuring when the only
    thing to do to feint is fullblock plus not everyone falls for it and sure I could go for shieldbash but I think
    it would be better if conq could feint his heavies.
    Share this post

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by atac56 Go to original post
    how come in every post about the conqueror needing a buff the black prior is cited as justification? i'm not agreeing or disagreeing about the conqueror needing a buff, i just want to know why these 2 characters are regarded as similar. theyre played completely different
    Because Prior is a counterfeit Conqueror compensating with a bigger shield.
    Share this post

  8. #8
    Originally Posted by AmonDarkGod Go to original post
    And much better offense. But sadly defense has always been stronger than offense...
    That's the side effect of nerfing from the top as opposed to buffing from the bottom. Some nerfs needed to happen but if the balancing wasn't so nerf heavy we'd have more than three or four viable characters at a time (at competitive level at least, the level most of us live at, including me, that isn't as much a thing).

    On original topic, conq needs defensive nerfs and offensive buffs, but ubi don't currently have a good track record in doing both at the same time hence characters spending a year at the top then a year at the bottom in one fell nerf pass.
    Share this post

  9. #9

    Si!! El conquer si necesita un Buff de daño!!!

    El BP hace un daño de lijeros mas potentes que el Conquer!!
    Share this post