Conq is pretty strong right now I think. I only got like 8 hours of playtime with conq but I frequently get deleted by really good conq players so it doesn't feel like he really needs a buff. In fact i'd like for his dodges to not make his shield glow white and play a sound effect as right now, any dodge can be mistaken for a bash almost.Originally Posted by The_Wanderer_I Go to original post
how come in every post about the conqueror needing a buff the black prior is cited as justification? i'm not agreeing or disagreeing about the conqueror needing a buff, i just want to know why these 2 characters are regarded as similar. theyre played completely differentOriginally Posted by The_Wanderer_I Go to original post
*sad 'Horfðu á mig'*Originally Posted by AmonDarkGod Go to original post
Because Prior is a counterfeit Conqueror compensating with a bigger shield.Originally Posted by atac56 Go to original post
That's the side effect of nerfing from the top as opposed to buffing from the bottom. Some nerfs needed to happen but if the balancing wasn't so nerf heavy we'd have more than three or four viable characters at a time (at competitive level at least, the level most of us live at, including me, that isn't as much a thing).Originally Posted by AmonDarkGod Go to original post
On original topic, conq needs defensive nerfs and offensive buffs, but ubi don't currently have a good track record in doing both at the same time hence characters spending a year at the top then a year at the bottom in one fell nerf pass.