Community Survey Results and Feedback | Forums

[LaMOi]

Not really. I think they'd love to go back on it for Breakpoint.

As I've said before, they went in deep with a code architecture/data structure that is moving them towards an ultimate goal of game streaming and Stadia. They have to go back for a lot of rework to change that. That is what they are considering and I doubt they could even cost it at this point.

Blue to be fair — that’s your own speculation on this topic, you don’t know this.

I think he has a point. They didn’t even dare name the feature, which is quite interesting.

[LaMOi]

It is only a minority concern...

Yeah.... You keep saying that.


I’m not sure what you’re actually basing that conclusion on?
Or are you just continually trolling those that are bothered by this feature....?

[Kangamangus556]

It is only a minority concern, so I can understand why it wouldn't get as much attention as other items.

Overall, the intention to innovate the game based on feedback goes beyond what I expected would be attempted.

Hmm...if only they gave us the raw data to support your claim...30%+ of 'players' is all they were willing to talk about about the feature that they will not name.

...despite what you say, the thread calling for offline play is still the largest and most active thread. It's the most requested feature in Tweet feeds on the official page. If they aren't showing us all of the numbers from the survey, I bet you more people asked for it than they are revealing with this data set. But okay...insist 'it's a minority.'

[solokiller]

Hmm...if only they gave us the raw data to support your claim...30%+ of 'players' is all they were willing to talk about about the feature that they will not name.

...despite what you say, the thread calling for offline play is still the largest and most active thread. It's the most requested feature in Tweet feeds on the official page. If they aren't showing us all of the numbers from the survey, I bet you more people asked for it than they are revealing with this data set. But okay...insist 'it's a minority.'

It is odd that the player numbers are all nice round numbers. It says stuff like 50%+ so the real amount could be anything really.

[Kangamangus556]

It is odd that the player numbers are all nice round numbers. It says stuff like 50%+ so the real amount could be anything really.

More revealing is the labeled demographic 'players.' Considering they asked people if they played the beta, if they owned the game, if they were currently playing, if they had quit playing, etc., they can cook those numbers to represent the specific set of players that best suits their agenda and narrative. Sure, maybe only the small set of people still playing this game voted the exact way the presented data set says, but that's not going to move the units they want, or respect the consumers that feel ripped off and uninstalled their broken product.

[El_Cuervacho]

"We know that certain players are still unable to enjoy the polished version of the game that we had hoped to release at launch."

"Certain" should be replaced with "many". They polished this with a set of keys.

Glad to see some more continuity in communication. Quality outcomes have yet to be delivered though.

And from "many" it should, once again be replaced to "all"..

[mediabrands33]

Its obviously something fishy going on. By reading this post-show 70% voted for offline and 30% voted for more story content. We need raw data. Plus they knew AI teammates should of been in this type of game off jump street. Just like in Wildlands you can remove them from the game in the settings menu if you're annoyed. In gear score shouldn't never been placed in these type of games ever.

[B_SoF]

that is very strange for sure

[PLAYER_77422]

They couldn't even say "remove online requirement" lol!

What I read from this is come back in February.

mention working on everything but that one thing.

makes me want to punch something....

[GAP_Computer]

If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.