"Ubisoft is listening..." | Forums

[hoak]

The issue in this thread is whether or not Ubisoft are listening, because clearly your opening post was to ridicule that prospect.

No, that again is your assumption, or presumption to make an augment. The logical, honest and rational read of the OT post is there is an ENORMOUS amount of criticism Ubisoft is deaf to.

It is not a strawman to let you know that they are, but to genuine Ghost Recon fans and others that are capable of a constructive critique about the franchise without insulting others that disagree with them.

This is a non sequitur, it's not even a sentence or comprehensible.

You claim above that Wildlands was, after all, a tactical realism game? Whatever that is.

No, read what I wrote for meaning, I make it explicitly objectively clear what a tactical realism game is, you can't avoid knowing unless you either can't read or are dishonest.

Your view of it sounds exactly the same as your view of Breakpoint as you said of Wildlands at the time that it "has none of the even most basic elements of a tactical realism game". Why would I take your views of Breakpoint seriously when you are so inconsistent.

No. That's not what I said, suggested or implied -- that's you doing the same thing you consistently do with straw man informal fallacies 'so what you're saying is'. Let me give you an example: From everything you've said here BLUEFOX you clearly hate everyone but yourself. At least make a token effort to understand the premise of the statement your taking exception to; this is not hard, unless you're just bickering for the sake of bickering and trolling...

[AI BLUEFOX]

"They are listening" is neither an assumption or presumption on my part, it is a simple matter of fact. Addressing your comment is not a non-sequitur and we both know it, so stop trying to blow a smoke screen over the discussion about your changing stance on Wildlands. There are no fallacies in me quoting your views on and saying "sounds", because clearly I am conveying my interpretation of your meaning.

As you like your fallacies so much, maybe quit with the on-going ad-hominem; you use this whenever someone has the temerity to question your arguments.

[hoak]

"They are listening" is neither an assumption or presumption on my part, it is a simple matter of fact.

No one said or suggested it wasn't but you...

Addressing your comment is not a non-sequitur..

But you're not addressing any of my comments, or questions your creating your own...

...so stop trying to blow a smoke screen over the discussion about your changing stance on Wildlands.

Re-read what I wrote -- I haven't changed my stance on Wildlands....

There are no fallacies in me quoting your views on and saying "sounds", because clearly I am conveying my interpretation of your meaning.

You just contradicted yourself here: (1) you never have 'quoted' me (2) you always paraphrase and present your subjective 'interpretations' as new created meaning; this is NOT quoting, is very disingenuous, and is something you've been criticized for in other threads.

As you like your fallacies so much, maybe quit with the on-going ad-hominem; you use this whenever someone has the temerity to question your arguments.

There are hundreds of people I disagree with on these forums that don't resort to your subjective weird 'interpretations' or this kind of irrational pettiness. This is a forum -- if it requires 'temerity' to question anything, you'd be a very weak person...

You're the one that constantly bickers with people in threads criticizing the game, you don't seem to be able to tolerate any criticism of this game, or difference of opinion from your own, especially if it's factually based, and you have without exception refused to discuss any facts.

Since everything here is so objectionable to you, why don't you just avoid these threads, and chime in on the everything is awesome threads? Or even better and more fun for you; why not play the game that's so awesome?

The hysterical posts and constant appearance in these threads make you sound an awfully lot like someone with buyer's remorse that is in denial...

[QuyetStorrm]

If UBISOFT was really listening, they would allow the game to be played offline since not everyone has good internet let alone have internet at all.

[Steeltooth_]

Are PS4 and XBox version also online only? If so then there's an honest to god function involved that probably can't be removed.

If not then you could buy both a PS4 and and Xbox for what it cost you to buy a computer that would run this game.