🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Ghost-Recon forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #81
    Originally Posted by Poppadom97 Go to original post
    Ok so after messing around and alt tabbing in and out it went from 29 fps to 60fps. Only thing i changed was go into borderless mode and back into fullscreen, no clue what changed but its now at 4k and 60 fps at low preset. I will now begin to raise the optioons from here see what i get.
    I call BS, post screenshots, your only going to get 35-45 fps avg with a 1080ti @4k and make sure your in a populated area with a lot of buildings.
    Share this post

  2. #82
    AMD Ryzen 5 2600 cpu
    Nvidia Asus O.C. 6 GB GTX 1060 gpu
    16 gb ram 3000 mhz RAM

    1080p, Very High settings, 55 - 60 as V-Sync off, (screen tearings annoying), and V-Sync on, drops to 40 - 45s. (Have benchmark scores both V-sync off and on)
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  3. #83
    ES-Ulukai's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,448
    Mine is :

    I7: 4790K

    16Go Ram

    RTX 2060

    Got FPS going from 57 to 90-100

    But when I see the specs recommanded for Red Dead Redemption 2 I think that there's something to learn about optimisation from Rockstar Games !
    Share this post

  4. #84
    Originally Posted by digsgravy Go to original post
    There are games that run better at 4k or 1440p 120, 144 and 165 fps, with newer hardware; the battlefield series has always been a well optimized game. In BF1 and BFV (DX11) My system can push 165 fps maxed out @1440p.

    However in BF1 I was able to play 4k 60fps avg with 1070 SLI, and when I upgraded to a single 1080ti, I had to drop some AA settings to get 55-60 fps @4k in BF1. As time went on with BF1 updates and nvidia drivers, 4k was not playable anymore and started using 1440p instead.

    But wildlands, I gave perf numbers 45-70 fps of my 1440p experience from memory. Atlass just posted before you; similar frame rates for a 9700k and 1080ti for GRB and of course you will see a 10-15 fps increase with the newer intel architecture. My wildlands perf was on a 3.7Ghz with a 1080ti at that time. And I think Breakpoint runs better than GRW

    Newer and recent AAA and AA titles, with graphics maxed out, on a 2080ti is required for an above 60 fps experience @1440p, remnant from the ashes is another example and I could list a ton of titles dating back to 2017 that would require a 1080ti and now in 2019 a 2080ti for 1440p. Its not just isolated to UBI games.

    So your factually wrong and are not understanding the leap in gaming design and assets and the hardware it takes to run it.

    I would say the opposite; there are a only a handful of games that you could run @4k (not on low medium settings) with a 1080ti and now in 2019 with a 2080ti. So people with older hardware, AMD 3 and 4 series, nvidia 10 series, need to understand with newer titles a less then ideal 1440p experience, without a newer generation intel or 3 series ryzen is on the table so 1080p is what is playable.

    GRB is optimized and runs great..
    No, it's not. And I don't care how much crap you type out it's a damn fact that you don't need a 1080ti for 1440p and never have. A 1080ti is considerably more powerful than my card and other than Ubi games and metro I pretty much max out everything at 60fps. That's a fact...not an opinion.
    I just used BFV as an example of a game that was optimized really well. And that is the opposite of Ubi. I love breakpoint but it's not overly optimized. It's not consistent and it needs to be cleaned up. On top of that just look at how they have made any textures at a distance really blurry. It when you go into a building the frame rate tanks...for what? There is absolutely nothing inside buildings to justify killing your performance. It's not optimized. You can't tell everyone on the past 10 pages with decent hardware that they are wrong. It's bs.
    Share this post

  5. #85
    Originally Posted by Poppadom97 Go to original post
    Yea im also struggling getting good performance.
    Specs:
    I7-7700k
    GTX 1080 TI
    32 GB RAM

    If i go anything higher than 1080p i get a drop of about 30 fps even on the lowest preset settings. 4k isnt even close on low settings for me it was at around 23 fps. At 1080p i can only run at high setting and get around 55-60 fps. The main problem for me is that my main monitor is 4k and turning the resolution to 1080p on a 4k monitor is just absolute garbage of blurryness.
    Well i cant speak for 4k resolution but at 1080p with your setup (similar to my specs) you should be able to run on ULTRA preset with stable 80+ frames.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  6. #86
    Originally Posted by ES-Ulukai Go to original post
    Mine is :

    I7: 4790K

    16Go Ram

    RTX 2060

    Got FPS going from 57 to 90-100

    But when I see the specs recommanded for Red Dead Redemption 2 I think that there's something to learn about optimisation from Rockstar Games !
    Exactly. Now to be fair grb is a better looking game but the requirements are drastic different too. GRB is not well optimized...it's just not. I don't care what some say who are running 2080ti taking about how well optimized it is. That kind of card should be running the game at 200 fps at 1440p with good optimization.
    Share this post

  7. #87
    Originally Posted by Ohnoozer Go to original post
    No, it's not. And I don't care how much crap you type out it's a damn fact that you don't need a 1080ti for 1440p and never have. A 1080ti is considerably more powerful than my card and other than Ubi games and metro I pretty much max out everything at 60fps. That's a fact...not an opinion.
    I just used BFV as an example of a game that was optimized really well. And that is the opposite of Ubi. I love breakpoint but it's not overly optimized. It's not consistent and it needs to be cleaned up. On top of that just look at how they have made any textures at a distance really blurry. It when you go into a building the frame rate tanks...for what? There is absolutely nothing inside buildings to justify killing your performance. It's not optimized. You can't tell everyone on the past 10 pages with decent hardware that they are wrong. It's bs.
    Hey my goal is not to prove you wrong, its to educate.. obviously its your selective perception and game selection and lack of understanding that's coming into play here.

    You said your card is about on par or a little faster then a 1070 and that your system could push 1440p 60fps+ np, Sure in some games in 2017 that was possible and still is, Six siege you should be able to get 60fps on mostly high settings @1440p with an OC. And battlefield mostly high not ultra settings you might get 45-66 fps.

    I would consider a 1070 in 2019 a 1080p card, some titles a 45 fps 1440p experience, maybe 60 fps on low med setting

    You can run Modern warfare 2 at 4k and half life 2 at 4k, but that doesn't mean its 4k capable for all games. Same with BF series @ 1440p and older COD and BOPS titles, it doesn't mean its 1440 capable for every game.

    But your sure of it, because you can run all games at 1440p maxed out at 60fps+ with a card thats on par with a 1070.
    Share this post

  8. #88
    Originally Posted by digsgravy Go to original post
    Hey my goal is not to prove you wrong, its to educate.. obviously its your selective perception and game selection and lack of understanding that's coming into play here.

    You said your card is about on par or a little faster then a 1070 and that your system could push 1440p 60fps+ np, Sure in some games in 2017 that was possible and still is, Six siege you should be able to get 60fps on mostly high settings @1440p with an OC. And battlefield mostly high not ultra settings you might get 45-66 fps.

    I would consider a 1070 in 2019 a 1080p card, some titles a 45 fps 1440p experience, maybe 60 fps on low med setting

    You can run Modern warfare 2 at 4k and half life 2 at 4k, but that doesn't mean its 4k capable for all games. Same with BF series @ 1440p and older COD and BOPS titles, it doesn't mean its 1440 capable for every game.

    But your sure of it, because you can run all games at 1440p maxed out at 60fps+ with a card thats on par with a 1070.
    What games would you say have justified 1080ti for 1440p? Because I can't think of a single one.
    Share this post

  9. #89
    ghstbstr's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV.
    Posts
    159
    Originally Posted by ES-Ulukai Go to original post
    Mine is :
    I7: 4790K
    16Go Ram
    RTX 2060
    Got FPS going from 57 to 90-100
    How are you getting that high of fps with that cpu and gpu? What settings ingame are you playing on?
    Share this post

  10. #90
    Well I listed a few in the thread, also it is defined by what you think is playable, my preference is 70+ fps minimum with maxed out settings @1440p, for single player and 90-120 fps min for multiplayer @1440p usually maxed.

    With that said, I needed two 1070 in SLI to get 90-120 fps in BF1 @1440p and 60fps @4k in BF1 when it was first released.

    60 fps with drops to 45 fps is just to framey for me, given I was ecstatic to run the original crysis on mostly ultra with a special config and get 28-30 fps @1080p on a nvidia 280.

    1080ti games for 1440p
    --------------------------------
    Crysis 3 - 70-90fps ultra best Anti Aliasing AA could run 4k too.
    Wildlands,- 1080ti Mostly ultra some high, reduced AA I could get around 70+ fps at 1440p but it could drop to 45 fps
    PUBG when its was first released. 1440p 70 -90fps
    Battlefield 1 (after updates) and BFV,
    Gears of War 4
    Batman Arkham Knight
    Dark Souls 3
    MechWarrior online
    Remnant of the ashes
    Tomb Raider series
    Wolfenstein series
    Shadow of War
    Mordhau
    Far cry series
    Dues EX Mankind divided
    Destiny 2
    Fallout 4
    The division 1
    Witcher 3
    Metro last light
    Insurgency Sandstorm

    And the list can go on..
    Share this post